Mrs.A Indira v. M/s.Sundaram Finance LimitedRep.by its Manager (Legal)21
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ss. 9(1)(ii)(e), 17
Judgment
Arb Appln No. 1006 of 2026__________Page1 of 4IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABUArb Appln No. 1006 of 2026 Mrs.A Indira..Petitioner(s)VsM/s.Sundaram Finance LimitedRep.by its Manager (Legal)21, Patullos Road, Chennai 600 002...Respondent(s)Judge’s Summon filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Sie Rules read with Section 9(1)(ii)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996, praying to raise the order of attachment dated 19.06.2019 in I.A.No.31 of 2019 in Arbitration Case No.VKT/SF/115/2018 on the file of the Hon’ble Arbitral Tribunal attaching the immovable property morefully described in the schedule to the Judge’s Summons and a copy of the order raising attachment be transmitted through the Principal District Court, Tiruvallur and communicated to SRO Tiruvelangadu. For Petitioner(s):Mr.V PerumalFor Respondent(s):Mr.D.Pradeep Kumar (Takes Notice)ORDERThis Arbitration Application has been filed to raise the order of attachment dated dated 19.06.2019 in I.A.No.31 of 2019 in Arbitration Case No.VKT/SF/115/2018 on the file of the Hon'ble Arbitral Tribunal attaching the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1006 of 2026__________Page2 of 4immovable property morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons and a copy of the order raising attachment be transmitted through the Principal District Court, Tiruvallur and communicated to SRO, Tiruvelangadu.
Mr.D.Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondent.
An order of attachment had been made under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and thereafter, an Award had been passed.
It is the case of the learned counsel appearing on either side that, after the Award had been passed, the parties have settled the dispute and resolved the issues between themselves.
In view of the same, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that there would be no objection for raising the order of attachment passed under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1006 of 2026__________Page3 of 46. Recording the same, this Arbitration Application stands ordered as prayed for. No costs.03-06-2026Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/NoNote: Registry is directed to communicate the copy of this order to the Sub-Registrar, Tiruvelangadu, Tiruvallur District.kakTo1. The Principal District Court, Tiruvallur. 2. The Sub-Registrar, SRO, Tiruvelangadu, Tiruvallur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 1006 of 2026__________Page4 of 4K.KUMARESH BABU, J.kakArb Appln No. 1006 of 202603-06-2026
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.