K. Munirathinam v. Chennai-600 001.2. M/s. Star International Foods Exports No.282, S.N.Chetty Street Royapuram Chennai-13.3
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default in thepresence of the learned Government Advocate
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.03.2008CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.MISRAW.P.No.2244/2008& M.P.No.1 of 2008K. Munirathinam ... Petitioner-Vs.-1. The State Bank of Mysore Chennai Main Branch No.231, N.S.C. Bose Road Chennai-600 001.
M/s. Star International Foods Exports No.282, S.N.Chetty Street Royapuram Chennai-13.
K.V.Somasundaram4. Krishnamoorthy5. K. Dhamodharan6. B. Sundaravalli7. M. Amaravathi ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property in Survey Nos.126/1B-1.51 acres, 126/2-0.13 1/2 acres,126/3A-0.02 1/2 cents, 126/3B-0.79 acres, 126/4-0.78 acres, 127/1-0.32acres and 127/2-0.26 acres of land at No.35, Pangarshikuppam Village, Gudiyattam Taluk, Vellore District in land Patta No.32.For Petitioner : N.A.For Respondents : Mr.P.Subramanian, GA- - - https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Operative part
O R D E RToday, when the matter is called, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. On the previous occasion also, there was no appearance. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default in the presence of the learned Government Advocate. Consequently, the connectedMP is closed. No costs. Sd/Asst. Registrar/true copy/Sub Asst. Registrar Tr/To1. The State Bank of Mysore Chennai Main Branch No.231, N.S.C. Bose Road Chennai-600 001.MA (CO)MMP 8.4.08W.P.No.2244/2008& Connected MP.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default in thepresence of the learned Government Advocate
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.