S.Sivaji v. The State of Tamil Nadu
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the same, the Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st respondent in G.O.Ms.No.88, dated 1.3.2006 Tamil Development-Culture and Religious Endowment (As.Ni.) 2.2. and G.O.Ms.No.34, dated 31.1.2007, Department of Tamil Development-Culture and Religious Endowment and Information (Aa.No.2.2.) and quash the same and direct the 1st respondent to include the name of the petitioner in the panel of Recruitment for Assistant Commissioner in the year 2003-2004. For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.Vaithyanathan For Respondents : M.Maharaja Special Government Pleader
O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Operative part
2. In view of the same, the Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
18.09.2018 Index : No Rj To
The Secretary to Tamil Development, Religious Endowment and Information Department Fort St. George Chennai 600 009.
The Commissioner Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment Mahatma Gandhi Road Chennai - 600 034. M.DURAISWAMY, J Rj W.P.No.12527 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010
18.09.2018
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the same, the Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.