M.K.Saimohan v. Review Applications
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In view of the endorsement, the Review Applications are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. s/d- Assistant Registrar(CO) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To The VII Judge Small Causes Court Chennai. VD(CO) SP(11/02/2019) Review Application Nos.96 & 97 of…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY Review Application Nos.96 & 97 of 2011 in C.R.P.(PD).Nos.623 & 624 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 in Review Application No.96 of 2011 M.K.Saimohan ... Review Applicant in both Review Applications S.Gowrishankaran Vs. ... Respondent in both Review Applications Review Applications filed under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 08.04.2011 made in C.R.P(PD).Nos.623 & 624 of 2011. CRP.(PD) 623 & 624/2011: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 12.01.2011 made in M.P. 212/2010 in R.C.A. 23/2010 and M.P. 616/2010 in R.C.A. 256/2010 in VII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai. For Review Applicant (in both Review Applications) : Mr.G.Jayachandran C O M M O N
O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought the permission of this Court to withdraw the Review Applications and has also made an endorsement to that effect.
In view of the endorsement, the Review Applications are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. s/d- Assistant Registrar(CO) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To The VII Judge Small Causes Court Chennai. VD(CO) SP(11/02/2019) Review Application Nos.96 & 97 of 2011 in C.R.P.(PD).Nos.623 & 624 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 in Review Application No.96 of 2011
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Madras High Court, on 07 Jan 2019. The bench was M DURAISWAMY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.