✦ High Court of India · 20 Jun 2025

Madrasdated High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 20 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
20 Jun 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,298 words

W.P.No.15575 of 20243. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Coimbatore Income Tax Department No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore 641 018. ...Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the 1st Respondent to quash the impugned under u/s 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 28.03.2024 in DIN:ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2023-24/1063583397(1) for the Assessment Year 2022-23.For Petitioner: Mr.A.S.SriramanFor Respondents : Dr.B.Ramaswamy Senior Panel Counsel ORDER The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order dated 28.03.2024 pertaining to the Assessment Year 2022-2023 passed by the 1st respondent and to quash the same. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the first respondent has issued a show cause notice on 20.03.2024, for which 2/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024the petitioner submitted its reply on 22.03.2024 through the Income Tax Portal. Thereafter, another show cause notice was issued by the 1st respondent on 24.03.2024, for which the petitioner filed its reply on 25.03.2024 through the income tax portal. Subsequently the 1st respondent, without providing sufficient time to file the necessary replies/documents passed the impugned order on 28.03.2024 confirming the proposals contained in the show cause notice. Being aggrieved over the same,the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition. 3. Further, he would submit that though the petitioner made an attempt to avail personal hearing opportunity, they failed due to the reason that immediately after filling of the reply column, the portal automatically got closed, which had resulted in not availing the opportunity of hearing, as the same is beyond the control of the petitioner and cannot be construed as a fault on the part of the petitioner. Therefore, impugned order came to be passed without hearing the petitioner and therefore it suffers from violation of principles of natural justice and he prays to set aside the same.3/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024 4. Per contra, Dr.B.Ramaswamy learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the Respondents strongly opposed the said contention by stating that in show cause notices itself, it is clearly mentioned that the personal hearing can be availed by clicking the seek video conferencing button available against the show cause notice in the view notices of the proceeding in the e-proceedings tab on e-filing portal. But, the petitioner has not availed the said opportunity and therefore impugned order came to be passed. However, he fairly explained about the working of the portal and submitted that the personal hearing option has to be filled up before filing the reply column. If not the portal will automatically close after the filling of the reply column. Therefore, it is for the petitioner to fill the said column before filling the reply column and they cannot blame the respondent-Department. He therefore prays for dismissal of the writ petition. 5. I have given due consideration to the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.4/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024 6. It is the case of the respondents that though a specific option was given for availing the personal hearing opportunity in the Portal and which was also clearly indicated in the show cause notice itself, the petitioner failed to avail the said opportunity. Therefore, it cannot be said that impugned order passed is in violation of principles of natural justice. But it is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that immediately after filling up of the reply column, the portal automatically disappeared. 7. It is a settled law that violation of principles of natural justice is a failure of due process. If any order is passed against the petitioner with demand, that order has to be passed after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, as otherwise, it will amount to depriving the interest of the petitioner and the same amounts to violation of principles of natural justice. 8. In the case on hand, due to technical glitch, the petitioner could not opt for personal hearing in the portal and ultimately the impugned order was passed without giving opportunity of personal hearing to the Petitioner 5/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024and therefore the same is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, this Court passes the following order:(i) The impugned order dated 28.03.2024 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the 1st respondent, subject to the payment of a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the Principal Government Naturopathy Medical College and Hospital, Account No.7883022723, IFSC Code: IDIB000M157, within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the setting aside of the impugned order will take effect from the date of payment of the said amount.(ii) Upon production of proof with regard to the payment of a sum of Rs.10,000/- as stated above, the Respondents shall activate the Departmental portal, within a period of two weeks, in order to enable the petitioner to file their reply, (iii) The petitioner shall file their reply/objection along with the required documents, if any, within a period of 15 days thereafter.6/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024(iv) On filing of such reply/objection by the petitioner, the respondent shall consider the same and issue a 14 days clear notice by fixing the date of personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible.9. With the above observations & directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 15.04.2025arrIndex : yes/noNeutral Citation : yes/no7/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024To1. The Assessment Unit Income Tax Department National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi-110 003.2. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2), Tiruppur Income Tax Department 60 Feet Road, Kumarnathapuram, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu 641 602.3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Coimbatore Income Tax Department No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore 641 018.8/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024 Krishnan Ramasamy,J.,arrW.P.No.15575 of 2024 15.04.20259/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 20.06.2025Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan RamasamyW.P.No.15575 of 2024andW.M.P.Nos.16964, 16965 and 16966 of 2024R.R. InternationalRepresented by PartnerNo.89/2, Avinashi Road,Padmavathipuram,Tirupur 641 603PAN:AAFFR3061F ...Petitioner Vs.1. The Assessment Unit Income Tax Department National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi-110 003.2. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2), Tiruppur Income Tax Department 60 Feet Road, Kumarnathapuram, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu 641 602.10/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 20243. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Coimbatore Income Tax Department No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore 641 018. ...Respondents For Petitioner: Mr.A.S.SriramanFor Respondents : Dr.B.Ramaswamy Senior Panel Counsel ORDER This matter has been listed under the caption 'For Being Mentioned'.2. In page 1, 3rd line of the prayer portion of the order dated 15.04.2025 made in the aforesaid writ petition, inadvertently the word 'order' was wrongly typed as 'under.' Registry is directed to carry out the aforesaid corrections and issue fresh order copy to the parties concerned. 20.06.2025arr11/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024To1. The Assessment Unit Income Tax Department National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi-110 003.2. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2), Tiruppur Income Tax Department 60 Feet Road, Kumarnathapuram, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu 641 602.3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Coimbatore Income Tax Department No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore 641 018.12/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024 Krishnan Ramasamy,J.,arrW.P.No.15575 of 2024 20.06.202513/13

W.P.No.15575 of 20243. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Coimbatore Income Tax Department No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore 641 018. ...Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the 1st Respondent to quash the impugned under u/s 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 28.03.2024 in DIN:ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2023-24/1063583397(1) for the Assessment Year 2022-23.For Petitioner: Mr.A.S.SriramanFor Respondents : Dr.B.Ramaswamy Senior Panel Counsel ORDER The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order dated 28.03.2024 pertaining to the Assessment Year 2022-2023 passed by the 1st respondent and to quash the same. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the first respondent has issued a show cause notice on 20.03.2024, for which 2/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024the petitioner submitted its reply on 22.03.2024 through the Income Tax Portal. Thereafter, another show cause notice was issued by the 1st respondent on 24.03.2024, for which the petitioner filed its reply on 25.03.2024 through the income tax portal. Subsequently the 1st respondent, without providing sufficient time to file the necessary replies/documents passed the impugned order on 28.03.2024 confirming the proposals contained in the show cause notice. Being aggrieved over the same,the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition. 3. Further, he would submit that though the petitioner made an attempt to avail personal hearing opportunity, they failed due to the reason that immediately after filling of the reply column, the portal automatically got closed, which had resulted in not availing the opportunity of hearing, as the same is beyond the control of the petitioner and cannot be construed as a fault on the part of the petitioner. Therefore, impugned order came to be passed without hearing the petitioner and therefore it suffers from violation of principles of natural justice and he prays to set aside the same.3/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024 4. Per contra, Dr.B.Ramaswamy learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the Respondents strongly opposed the said contention by stating that in show cause notices itself, it is clearly mentioned that the personal hearing can be availed by clicking the seek video conferencing button available against the show cause notice in the view notices of the proceeding in the e-proceedings tab on e-filing portal. But, the petitioner has not availed the said opportunity and therefore impugned order came to be passed. However, he fairly explained about the working of the portal and submitted that the personal hearing option has to be filled up before filing the reply column. If not the portal will automatically close after the filling of the reply column. Therefore, it is for the petitioner to fill the said column before filling the reply column and they cannot blame the respondent-Department. He therefore prays for dismissal of the writ petition. 5. I have given due consideration to the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.4/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024 6. It is the case of the respondents that though a specific option was given for availing the personal hearing opportunity in the Portal and which was also clearly indicated in the show cause notice itself, the petitioner failed to avail the said opportunity. Therefore, it cannot be said that impugned order passed is in violation of principles of natural justice. But it is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that immediately after filling up of the reply column, the portal automatically disappeared. 7. It is a settled law that violation of principles of natural justice is a failure of due process. If any order is passed against the petitioner with demand, that order has to be passed after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, as otherwise, it will amount to depriving the interest of the petitioner and the same amounts to violation of principles of natural justice. 8. In the case on hand, due to technical glitch, the petitioner could not opt for personal hearing in the portal and ultimately the impugned order was passed without giving opportunity of personal hearing to the Petitioner 5/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024and therefore the same is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, this Court passes the following order:(i) The impugned order dated 28.03.2024 is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the 1st respondent, subject to the payment of a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the Principal Government Naturopathy Medical College and Hospital, Account No.7883022723, IFSC Code: IDIB000M157, within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the setting aside of the impugned order will take effect from the date of payment of the said amount.(ii) Upon production of proof with regard to the payment of a sum of Rs.10,000/- as stated above, the Respondents shall activate the Departmental portal, within a period of two weeks, in order to enable the petitioner to file their reply, (iii) The petitioner shall file their reply/objection along with the required documents, if any, within a period of 15 days thereafter.6/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024(iv) On filing of such reply/objection by the petitioner, the respondent shall consider the same and issue a 14 days clear notice by fixing the date of personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible.9. With the above observations & directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 15.04.2025arrIndex : yes/noNeutral Citation : yes/no7/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024To1. The Assessment Unit Income Tax Department National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi-110 003.2. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2), Tiruppur Income Tax Department 60 Feet Road, Kumarnathapuram, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu 641 602.3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Coimbatore Income Tax Department No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore 641 018.8/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024 Krishnan Ramasamy,J.,arrW.P.No.15575 of 2024 15.04.20259/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 20.06.2025Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan RamasamyW.P.No.15575 of 2024andW.M.P.Nos.16964, 16965 and 16966 of 2024R.R. InternationalRepresented by PartnerNo.89/2, Avinashi Road,Padmavathipuram,Tirupur 641 603PAN:AAFFR3061F ...Petitioner Vs.1. The Assessment Unit Income Tax Department National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi-110 003.2. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2), Tiruppur Income Tax Department 60 Feet Road, Kumarnathapuram, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu 641 602.10/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 20243. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Coimbatore Income Tax Department No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore 641 018. ...Respondents For Petitioner: Mr.A.S.SriramanFor Respondents : Dr.B.Ramaswamy Senior Panel Counsel ORDER This matter has been listed under the caption 'For Being Mentioned'.2. In page 1, 3rd line of the prayer portion of the order dated 15.04.2025 made in the aforesaid writ petition, inadvertently the word 'order' was wrongly typed as 'under.' Registry is directed to carry out the aforesaid corrections and issue fresh order copy to the parties concerned. 20.06.2025arr11/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024To1. The Assessment Unit Income Tax Department National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi-110 003.2. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2), Tiruppur Income Tax Department 60 Feet Road, Kumarnathapuram, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu 641 602.3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Coimbatore Income Tax Department No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore 641 018.12/13 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15575 of 2024 Krishnan Ramasamy,J.,arrW.P.No.15575 of 2024 20.06.202513/13

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments