✦ High Court of India · 03 Jul 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 03 Jul 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
03 Jul 2025
Length
1,003 words

CMA No. 1328 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVICMA No. 1328 of 2025K.MuruganS/o. KuthalingamAppellantVsThe Managing DirectorMetropolitan Transport Corporation Limited, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002RespondentPRAYER :- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Sec.173 of Motor Vehicles Act, praying to allow the present appeal award enhance compensation in order dated 10-12-2024 in MCOP.No.2576/2021 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal(Small Causes Court/Special Sub Judge No.1, to deal with MCOP Cases) Chennai as prayed for in this CMAFor Appellant:Mr.R.NalliyappanFor Respondent:Mr.M.Murali Vinodh1/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1328 of 2025JUDGMENTThe petitioner not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal in MCOP No.2576 of 2021, dated 10.12.2024 has preferred this appeal seeking for enhancement of compensation.2.The case of the petitioner is that on 23.04.2021 at about 13.20 hours, when the petitioner riding his two wheeler bearing Regn. No. TN-07 CA-3372 along the R.K.Mutt Road near Narayanasam Thottam Kozhipanni Play ground, at that time, a bus bearing Regn. No. TN-01-AN-2759 driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner, dashed on the petitioner's two wheeler and caused an accident. Due to which, the petitioner sustained grievous injuries, for which he underwent treatment in the hospital. Under these circumstances, the claim petition came to be filed before the Tribunal seeking for payment of compensation of Rs.31,00,000/-.3.The Tribunal on considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, came to a conclusion that the accident had taken place only due to the rash and negligent driving on the part 2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1328 of 2025of the rider of the respondent transport corporation. Having come to such a conclusion, the Tribunal fixed the total compensation payable at Rs.3,67,500/- under various heads as follows:S.NoCompensation awarded under the headAmount(in Rs.)1.Disability 1,61,0002.Pain and sufferings35,0003.Transportation4,0004.Medical expenses1,18,5115.Extra nourishment10,0006.Attender charges3,9007.Loss of earnings25,0008.Loss of amenities10,000Total3,67,411Rounded off to3,67,5004.The above compensation was directed to be paid with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum. 5.The petitioner not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal has filed the present appeal before this Court seeking for enhancement of compensation. 3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1328 of 20256. The learned counsel for appellant would submit that the petitioner was a car driver and the accident was happened in the year 2021. But, the tribunal has fixed only a sum of Rs.12,500/- as notional monthly income and the same is to be enhanced. Furthermore, the tribunal had fixed the disability at 23% and had fixed only sum of Rs.7000/- per percentage of disability. Hence, he prayed to enhance the compensation. 7. The learned counsel for respondent transport corporation would submit that at the time of accident, he was a car driver, but he has not filed any documentary evidence to prove his income. Hence, the tribunal has rightly fixed the income of the petitioner as well as percentage for the disability, which needs no interference of this court. 8. Heard and considered rival submissions made by both learned counsel for appellant as well as respondent transport corporation and perused materials available on record. 9. Considering both side submissions, the fact reveals that admittedly, he was a car driver at the time of accident, which was happened in the year 2021. 4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1328 of 2025The tribunal had fixed only a sum of Rs.12,500/- towards notional income. Therefore, on considering the cost of living, this Court is inclined to enhance the notional income from Rs.12,500/- per month to Rs.16,000/- per month. On considering the injuries as well as treatment period, the learned Tribunal fixed two months for loss of income, but the learned counsel for appellant argues that due to the injuries sustained, he was not able to move outside and nearly about six months, he was not able to drive the car. Hence, six months period is to be taken for loss of income. By relying the discharge summary, the learned counsel for respondent would submit that only 13 days, he is in hospital, but however on seeing the grievous injury, this Court is inclined to modify the treatment period from two months to four months. Furthermore, the tribunal had fixed a sum of Rs.7000/- per percentage of disability. But, on considering the grievous injury suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to increase the amount awarded towards percentage of disability from Rs.7000/- to Rs.9000/- per percentage of disability. On seeing the facts, he has undergone surgeries during the treatment period and also took treatment as outpatient for some days in various hospitals. Considering that, the sum awarded for transportation is to be increased from 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1328 of 2025Rs.4,000/- to Rs.10,000/-. The compensation that has been fixed under the other heads are reasonable and does not require the interference of this Court.10.In the light of the above discussion, the compensation awarded by the tribunal is modified as follows:S.NoCompensation awarded under the headAmount awarded by the tribunal(in Rs.)Amount(in Rs.)Amount confirmed or granted or enhanced1.Disability (23% x Rs.9000)1,61,0002,07,000enhanced2.Pain and sufferings35,00035,000confirmed3.Transportation4,00010,000enhanced4.Medical expenses1,18,5111,18,511confirmed5.Extra nourishment10,00010,000confirmed6.Attender charges3,9003,900confirmed7. Loss of earning during the treatment periodRs.16,000/- x 4 = Rs.64,000/-25,00064,000enhanced 8.Loss of amenities10,00010,000confirmedCompensated awardedrounded off to 3,67,4113,67,5004,58,4114,58,42011.The compensation awarded by the tribunal at Rs.3,67,500/- is enhanced to Rs.4,58,420/-. The respondent transport corporation is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation, less the amount already deposited, together 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1328 of 2025with interest at 7.5% p.a. from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. Insofar as the enhanced compensation is concerned, the deficit court fee, if not paid, shall be paid by the claimants. The other directions issued by the Tribunal with regard to the mode of payment of compensation remains unaltered.12.In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed. No costs.03-07-2025Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/NorppTo1. Special Sub-Court-I, Small Causes Court, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai.2. Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court. 7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1328 of 2025T.V.THAMILSELVI J.rppCMA No. 1328 of 2025 03-07-20258/8

CMA No. 1328 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVICMA No. 1328 of 2025K.MuruganS/o. KuthalingamAppellantVsThe Managing DirectorMetropolitan Transport Corporation Limited, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002RespondentPRAYER :- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Sec.173 of Motor Vehicles Act, praying to allow the present appeal award enhance compensation in order dated 10-12-2024 in MCOP.No.2576/2021 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal(Small Causes Court/Special Sub Judge No.1, to deal with MCOP Cases) Chennai as prayed for in this CMAFor Appellant:Mr.R.NalliyappanFor Respondent:Mr.M.Murali Vinodh1/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1328 of 2025JUDGMENTThe petitioner not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal in MCOP No.2576 of 2021, dated 10.12.2024 has preferred this appeal seeking for enhancement of compensation.2.The case of the petitioner is that on 23.04.2021 at about 13.20 hours, when the petitioner riding his two wheeler bearing Regn. No. TN-07 CA-3372 along the R.K.Mutt Road near Narayanasam Thottam Kozhipanni Play ground, at that time, a bus bearing Regn. No. TN-01-AN-2759 driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner, dashed on the petitioner's two wheeler and caused an accident. Due to which, the petitioner sustained grievous injuries, for which he underwent treatment in the hospital. Under these circumstances, the claim petition came to be filed before the Tribunal seeking for payment of compensation of Rs.31,00,000/-.3.The Tribunal on considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, came to a conclusion that the accident had taken place only due to the rash and negligent driving on the part 2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1328 of 2025of the rider of the respondent transport corporation. Having come to such a conclusion, the Tribunal fixed the total compensation payable at Rs.3,67,500/- under various heads as follows:S.NoCompensation awarded under the headAmount(in Rs.)1.Disability 1,61,0002.Pain and sufferings35,0003.Transportation4,0004.Medical expenses1,18,5115.Extra nourishment10,0006.Attender charges3,9007.Loss of earnings25,0008.Loss of amenities10,000Total3,67,411Rounded off to3,67,5004.The above compensation was directed to be paid with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum. 5.The petitioner not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal has filed the present appeal before this Court seeking for enhancement of compensation. 3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1328 of 20256. The learned counsel for appellant would submit that the petitioner was a car driver and the accident was happened in the year 2021. But, the tribunal has fixed only a sum of Rs.12,500/- as notional monthly income and the same is to be enhanced. Furthermore, the tribunal had fixed the disability at 23% and had fixed only sum of Rs.7000/- per percentage of disability. Hence, he prayed to enhance the compensation. 7. The learned counsel for respondent transport corporation would submit that at the time of accident, he was a car driver, but he has not filed any documentary evidence to prove his income. Hence, the tribunal has rightly fixed the income of the petitioner as well as percentage for the disability, which needs no interference of this court. 8. Heard and considered rival submissions made by both learned counsel for appellant as well as respondent transport corporation and perused materials available on record. 9. Considering both side submissions, the fact reveals that admittedly, he was a car driver at the time of accident, which was happened in the year 2021. 4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1328 of 2025The tribunal had fixed only a sum of Rs.12,500/- towards notional income. Therefore, on considering the cost of living, this Court is inclined to enhance the notional income from Rs.12,500/- per month to Rs.16,000/- per month. On considering the injuries as well as treatment period, the learned Tribunal fixed two months for loss of income, but the learned counsel for appellant argues that due to the injuries sustained, he was not able to move outside and nearly about six months, he was not able to drive the car. Hence, six months period is to be taken for loss of income. By relying the discharge summary, the learned counsel for respondent would submit that only 13 days, he is in hospital, but however on seeing the grievous injury, this Court is inclined to modify the treatment period from two months to four months. Furthermore, the tribunal had fixed a sum of Rs.7000/- per percentage of disability. But, on considering the grievous injury suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to increase the amount awarded towards percentage of disability from Rs.7000/- to Rs.9000/- per percentage of disability. On seeing the facts, he has undergone surgeries during the treatment period and also took treatment as outpatient for some days in various hospitals. Considering that, the sum awarded for transportation is to be increased from 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1328 of 2025Rs.4,000/- to Rs.10,000/-. The compensation that has been fixed under the other heads are reasonable and does not require the interference of this Court.10.In the light of the above discussion, the compensation awarded by the tribunal is modified as follows:S.NoCompensation awarded under the headAmount awarded by the tribunal(in Rs.)Amount(in Rs.)Amount confirmed or granted or enhanced1.Disability (23% x Rs.9000)1,61,0002,07,000enhanced2.Pain and sufferings35,00035,000confirmed3.Transportation4,00010,000enhanced4.Medical expenses1,18,5111,18,511confirmed5.Extra nourishment10,00010,000confirmed6.Attender charges3,9003,900confirmed7. Loss of earning during the treatment periodRs.16,000/- x 4 = Rs.64,000/-25,00064,000enhanced 8.Loss of amenities10,00010,000confirmedCompensated awardedrounded off to 3,67,4113,67,5004,58,4114,58,42011.The compensation awarded by the tribunal at Rs.3,67,500/- is enhanced to Rs.4,58,420/-. The respondent transport corporation is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation, less the amount already deposited, together 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1328 of 2025with interest at 7.5% p.a. from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. Insofar as the enhanced compensation is concerned, the deficit court fee, if not paid, shall be paid by the claimants. The other directions issued by the Tribunal with regard to the mode of payment of compensation remains unaltered.12.In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed. No costs.03-07-2025Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/NorppTo1. Special Sub-Court-I, Small Causes Court, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai.2. Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court. 7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA No. 1328 of 2025T.V.THAMILSELVI J.rppCMA No. 1328 of 2025 03-07-20258/8

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments