Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
WP Crl. No. 955 of 2026__________Page1 of 4IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMARWP Crl. No. 955 of 2026andW.P.M.P.Crl. No.316 of 20261.S.TamilselviW/o.Sundar Raj,80B, Kalyanapuram, Vyasarpadi, Chennai-600 039.
S.ManikandanS/o.Sundar Raj,80B, Kalyanapuram, Vyasarpadi, Chennai-600 039...Petitioner(s)Vs1.The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,P-3, Vyasarpadi Police Station, Chennai.2.P.JeevalakshmiD/o.Paramasivam, No.19, Sundharapuram 4th Street, Puliyanthope, Perambur Barracks, Chennai-600 012...Respondent(s)Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents not to harass the Petitioners in the guise of enquiry. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 955 of 2026__________Page2 of 4For Petitioner(s):Mr.R.RagavendranFor Respondents-1:Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThe Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the first respondents not to harass the petitioners in the guise of enquiry. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that based on the complaint given by the second respondent, an enquiry was conducted by the first respondent police in C.S.R.No.143 of 2026 and the same was closed on 04.04.2026.
Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Writ Petition is closed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.24-04-2026Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/NoRSI https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 955 of 2026__________Page3 of 4To1.The Inspector of Police,P-3, Vyasarpadi Police Station, Chennai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 955 of 2026__________Page4 of 4M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.RSIWP Crl. No. 955 of 2026andW.P.M.P.Crl. No.316 of 202624-04-2026
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.