✦ High Court of India · 21 Jan 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 21 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
21 Jan 2025
Length
1,463 words

Acts & Sections

C.M.A.No.2645 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.01.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU andTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVELC.M.A.No.2645 of 2024and C.M.P.No.21107 of 2024and C.M.A.No.3133 of 2024C.M.A.No.2645 of 2024Cholamandalam MS General Ins.Co.Ltd.,2nd Floor, shawallace Building,No.154, Tambu Chetty Street,Parry's Corner,Chennai - 600 001...Appellant Vs. 1. Balaiyan, S/o Munusamy2. Kannan S/o Natchu... RespondentPrayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 24.01.2024 made in MCOP.No.3281 of 2017 on the file of the Motor Page 1/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2645 of 2024Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court, Cuddalore.For Appellant : Ms.R.Sree VidhyaFor Respondent : Mrs.Ramya V.Rao for R1 No appearance for R2C.M.A.No.3133 of 2024Balaiyan,S/o Munusamy...Appellant Vs. 1. Kannan S/o Natchu, No.301, South Street, Old Colony, Koovagam, Ulunthurpet Taluk.2. Cholamandalam MS General Ins.Co.Ltd., 2nd Floor, shawallace Building, No.154, Tambu Chetty Street, Parry's Corner, Chennai - 600 001... RespondentsPrayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 24.01.2024 made in MCOP.No.3281 of 2017 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court, Cuddalore.For Appellant : Mrs.Ramya V.RaoPage 2/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2645 of 2024For Respondents : No appearance for R1 Ms.R.Sree Vidhya for R2 COMMON JUDGMENT(The judgment of the Court was delivered by J.Nisha Banu,J.)C.M.A.No.2645 of 2024 has been filed by the appellant/Insurance Company challenging the the judgment and decree dated 24.01.2024 made in M.C.O.P.No.3281 of 2017 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Special Sub-Court, Cuddalore, by which, the appellant/Insurance Company was directed to pay a sum of Rs.44,01,632/- as compensation to the 1st respondent/ injured claimant. C.M.A.No.3133 of 2024 has been filed by the injured claimant for enhancement of compensation.2. The case in brief in the claim petition is that on 03.03.2017 at about 19.30 hours, when the claimant was travelling in an auto rickshaw bearing Regn.No.TN-15-9526, the said auto was driven in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against another auto bearing Reg.No.TN-32-H-0609 which came in the opposite direction. Due to the impact, the claimant sustained grievous injuries. He was taken to Government Page 3/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2645 of 2024Hospital, Mundiyampakkam and then taken to MIOT Hospital, Chennai and treated as inpatient from 04.03.2017 to 06.03.2017 and surgery was done on 04.03.2017 and then, he was taken to Government General Hospital, Chennai and treated as an inpatient from 07.03.3017 to 08.05.2017 and surgery was done on 22.03.2017. Thereafter, he took further treatment in private hospitals. According to the claimant, the said accident occurred only due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the auto rickshaw bearing Reg.No.TN-15-9526. According to the claimant, the 1st and 2nd respondents/ owner and insurer of the said Auto Rickshaw bearing Regn.No.TN-15-9526 are jointly and several liable to pay the compensation to the claimant. The claimant had claimed a sum of Rs.50,00,000/- as compensation.3. The appellant Insurance Company has challenged the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal. The injured claimant has has sought for enhancement of compensation.4. Learned counsel for the appellant Insurance Company would state that there is no evidence in respect of earning capacity being Page 4/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2645 of 2024affected on a permanent basis and therefore, adopting the multiplier method and granting such a huge sum of Rs.36,28,800/- under the head of loss of earning capacity is not proper. He would further state that the Tribunal erred in awarding a sum of Rs.97,200/- towards Transport expenses without proper bills. The amount of Rs.1,20,000/- awarded for pain and sufferings, Rs.1,00,000/- towards loss of amenities and the amount awarded under the other heads are not in consonance with the facts and evidence. Hence, he would pray that the award passed by the Tribunal is liable to be set aside. 5. Learned counsel for the injured claimant would state that the injured is 32 years old and he is a M.Sc., M.Phil., graduate. He was employed in a private company and was earning a sum of Rs.25,000/- per month. The injured sustained 'compound grade 3B, severely comminuted both bone fracture in right leg, segmental shaft of femur fracture in right leg, chest injury- bilateral posterior basal dependent atelectasis'. He was treated as an inpatient for nearly 7 times and 8 surgeries were done. The medical board assessed his disability at 75%. The learned Tribunal ought to have converted it into 100% for loss of Page 5/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2645 of 2024earning. Further, the Tribunal has granted only Rs.35,000/- as attender charges which is very low. He would further state that the Tribunal ought to have fixed better notional monthly income. Hence, he would pray to enhance the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.6. Heard the learned counsel for the Insurance Company, the learned counsel for the claimant and perused the materials available on record.7. The Tribunal, under the impugned award, directed the Insurance Company to pay the claimant, a compensation of Rs.44,01,632/-(Rupees Forty Four lakhs One thousand Six Hundred and Thirty Two only) as detailed hereunder:HeadsAmount awarded by the Tribunal(Rs.)Loss of Income36,28,800Pain and Sufferings, mental agony1,20,000Medical expenses3,70,632Extra Nourishment20,000Attender Charges35,000Page 6/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2645 of 2024HeadsAmount awarded by the Tribunal(Rs.)Transportation charges97,200Loss of Amenities1,00,000Loss of Marital life30,000Total44,01,6328. Ex.P1 First Information Report, the earliest document, immediately after the accident, shows that it was the driver of the auto bearing registration No.TN-15-9526, who drove the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against another auto bearing Reg.No.TN-32-H-0609 which came in the opposite direction and caused the accident. Due to the said accident, the claimant sustained grievous injuries. Ex.P1-FIR as well as the evidence of P.W.1 clearly prove the negligence on the part of the driver of the auto bearing registration No.TN-15-9526. Therefore, we are of the considered view that the accident had occurred only due to the negligence on the part of the driver of the auto bearing registration No.TN-15-9526. 9. It is further seen that the injured had been assessed with 75% disability. The accident had occurred in the year 2017. Though it was Page 7/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2645 of 2024stated that the injured was working in a private company and was earning a sum of Rs.25,000/- per month, no document was produced to prove the same. Therefore, we are of the opinion that it would be fair and reasonable if a sum of Rs.16,500/- per month is fixed as his salary, instead of Rs.18,000/- fixed by the Tribunal. Considering the age of the injured, the Tribunal has rightly fixed 40% towards future prospects following the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in National Insurance Company Ltd., Vs. Pranay Sethi reported in (2018) 1 LW 331. Therefore, we fix the total loss of income as Rs.33,26,400/- ( i.e., 23,100 x 12 x16x 75/100).10. Insofar as the amount awarded for transportation charge is concerned, the Tribunal has fixed Rs.97,200/-, based on Ex.P12 & Ex.P24- Trip sheets and Ex.P11- ambulance bill, i.e., a sum of Rs.57,000/-, Rs.29,600/- and Rs.10,600/- respectively. We are of the opinion that it would be fair and proper if the same is enhanced to Rs.1,00,000/- instead of Rs.97,200/- as awarded by the Tribunal. Accordingly, we fix a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards transportation charges.Page 8/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2645 of 202411. Insofar as the amount awarded under the other heads are concerned, we are of the opinion that the same is reasonable and need not be interfered with.12. In the light of the above, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is hereby modified as under:S.NoDescriptionAmount awarded by Tribunal (Rs)Amount awarded by this Court(Rs)Award confirmed or enhanced or granted1.Loss of income36,28,80033,26,400Reduced2.Pain and suffering1,20,0001,20,000Confirmed3.Medical Bills3,70,6323,70,632Confirmed4.Extra Nourishment20,00020,000Confirmed5.Attender Charges35,00035,000Confirmed6.Transportation charges97,2001,00,000Enhanced7.Loss of Amenities1,00,0001,00,000Confirmed8.Loss of Marital Life30,00030,000ConfirmedTotalRs.44,01,632/-Rs.41,02,032/-Reduced by Rs.2,99,600-13. In the result, the CMA.No.2645/2024 is partly allowed and Page 9/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2645 of 2024CMA.No.3133/2024 is dismissed. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal i.e., Rs.44,01,632/- is hereby reduced to Rs.41,02,032/- together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till the date of realisation. The other conditions imposed by the Tribunal below with respect to the manner, in which, the compensation has to be paid, are sustained as such.14. It is submitted that the appellant Insurance Company has already deposited the entire amount, as per the award passed by the Tribunal. Hence, the Tribunal is directed to permit withdrawal of the amount, as per the modified award passed by this Court together with proportionate interest and costs, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The balance amount, shall be refunded to the appellant insurance company. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (J.N.B, J.) (R.S.V., J.)21.01.2025Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking ordervsiPage 10/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2645 of 2024To1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court, Cuddalore.2. The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, High Court, Madras. Page 11/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2645 of 2024J. NISHA BANU, J. andR. SAKTHIVEL, J.vsiC.M.A.No.2645 of 2024andC.M.A.No.3133 of 202421.01.2025Page 12/12

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments