✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

ANITA SUMANTH2 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

W.P.No.14553 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05.06.2024CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHW.P.No.14553 of 2024M/s.S.M.K.Contractors, Rep. by its PartnerB.Manoj Macniel, No.77/2, 1st Floor, Prakasam Salai, Chennai – 600 108..... Petitioner Vs1. The Superintendending Engineer, Highways, C & M, Chennai Circle, Chennai – 600 006.

2.

The Divisional Engineer, Highways, C & M, CCR Division, Periyapet, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015..... RespondentsPrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to disburse the payment of Rs.46,18,698/- with interest along with 18% GST to the petitioner for the work executed by the petitioner as per the Letter of acceptance in Letter. TRP No.155/2020-21 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14553 of 2024(Vol.37)/D2/Dt.07/09/2020 on the file of the 1st respondent based upon the representations of the petitioner dated 11.10.2022 and 25.04.2024.For Petitioner: Mr.S.Doraisamy for Mr.V.ElangovanFor Respondents: Mr.P.Harish Government AdvocateO R D E RMr.P.Harish, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents and is armed with instructions to enable final disposal of this Writ Petition, even at the stage of admission. 2. The petitioner has been engaged by the Highways Department as a Class I contractor. He claims to have executed several civil works for that Department. With regard to a tender called on 28.08.2020 for the execution of Junction improvement at Km 0/10 Tambaram – Mudichur – Sriperumbudur Road under road safety fund 2019-2020, the petitioner was successful.

3.

The total contract value was for a sum of Rs.93,67,273/-. The petitioner claims to have executed the works in line with prescribed norms and the terms of the contract. Though he had completed 65% of the work, he was unable to complete the work on account of non-2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14553 of 2024payment of the dues to him. Representations have been made by him on 11.10.2022 and 25.04.2024 seeking payment but there has been no response. Hence, the present Writ Petition seeking mandamus directing disbursal of payment of Rs.46,18,698/- with interest and GST for the works executed thus far.

4.

Mr.Harish, learned Government Advocate for the respondents states, on instructions, that extension of time had been granted for completion of the contracted work. The period of extension has expired and there has been no further progress in the matter. He further states that the contract contains an arbitration clause.5. In such an event, it is for the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner and convey their stand to them in order that the petitioner could make an informed choice as to what the course of action is, that he wishes to take. The existence or otherwise of a dispute cannot be assumed at this juncture.

6.

Hence, mandamus is issued to R1 to issue notice to the petitioner, hear then, consider representations dated 11.10.2022 and 25.04.2024 and pass orders on the same in accordance with law and all relevant rules and regulations, within a period of six (6) weeks from date of receipt of a copy of this order. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14553 of 2024Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.

7.

This Writ Petition is disposed as above. No costs. 05.06.2024SlIndex: Yes/NoSpeaking order: YesNeutral Citation: YesTo 1. The Superintendending Engineer, Highways, C & M, Chennai Circle, Chennai – 600 006.2. The Divisional Engineer, Highways, C & M, CCR Division, Periyapet, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.W.P.No.14553 of 20244/4

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments