Ford India Private LimitedRepresented by its Authorized Signatory v. Sarthi Wheels (India) Private LimitedNo.5
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Outcome
Allowed
The application is allowed on these terms
Provisions considered
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 s. 29A(5)
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Considering the current stage of the arbitral proceedings, mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The application is allowed on these terms.21.04.2026mmiA No. 1836 of 2026
Judgment
A No. 1836 of 2026__________Page1 of 2IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYA No. 1836 of 2026 Ford India Private LimitedRepresented by its Authorized Signatory, Ms.Shailaja Singh, Having its registered office atS.P.Koil Post, Chengalpattu, Kancheepuram - 603 204,Tamil Nadu...ApplicantVsSarthi Wheels (India) Private LimitedNo.5, Matruchhaya 14,Kasturba Nagar, Opposite 57/58, Arunoday Society, Alkapuri, Baroda - 390 007...RespondentApplication filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules r/w Section 29A(5) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to extend the time for passing the Arbitral Award in subject Arbitration Proceedings, by a further period of six months. For Applicant: Mr.Vinod KumarFor Respondent: Ms.Prita MithraORDERThe claimant before the Arbitral Tribunal has applied for extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.
Learned counsel submits that the claimant's arguments were heard and that arguments of the respondent are yet to be heard. He also https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 1836 of 2026__________Page2 of 2SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.mmipoints out that the current mandate expires on 23.04.2026. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the mandate being extended.
Operative part
Considering the current stage of the arbitral proceedings, mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The application is allowed on these terms.21.04.2026mmiA No. 1836 of 2026
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application is allowed on these terms
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 29A(5).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.