Radhika Venkatanarayanan v. M/s.Concept Homes India Pvt LtdRep.by its Direcor, Mr.S.Subramanian, Having Registered Office at
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Recording the same, this Arbitration Original Application stands dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Arb O.P No. 37 of 2026__________Page1 of 3IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 12-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABUArb O.P No. 37 of 2026 Radhika Venkatanarayanan..Applicant(s)VsM/s.Concept Homes India Pvt LtdRep.by its Direcor, Mr.S.Subramanian, Having Registered Office at, Flat No.G2 and G3, “Sai Keerty”, Plot No.5206, 10th street Ram Nagar, North Extension, Madipakkam, Chennai 600 091..Respondent(s)Petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, pleased to appoint any suitable person as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon and resolve the disputes that have arisen between the parties herein under the Membership Cancellation Agreement dated 12.01.2024.For Applicant(s):Mr.Abhinav ParthasarathyORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner had placed a letter to the Registry on 10.06.2026, indicating that the petitioner has sent an email to him, stating that the matter has been settled and requested him to withdraw this petition.https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb O.P No. 37 of 2026__________Page2 of 3K.KUMARESH BABU, J.2. Recording the same, this Arbitration Original Application stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 12-06-2026Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/NokakArb O.P No. 37 of 2026https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb O.P No. 37 of 2026__________Page3 of 3https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, this Arbitration Original Application stands dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11(6).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.