✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

C.M.P.No.18640 of 2021in W.A.No.1756 of 2021IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 06.12.2024CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDARANDTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABALC.M.P.No.18640 of 2021inW.A.No.1756 of 2021Kathiroli Manickam ... PetitionerVs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.2.The Commissioner, Urban Land Ceiling and Urban Land Tax, State of Tamil Nadu, Urban Land Ceiling Office, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.3.The Assistant Commissioner, Urban Land Ceiling and Urban Land Tax, Poonamallee Division, No.5, Sannathi Street, Page 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.18640 of 2021in W.A.No.1756 of 2021 Poonamallee, Chennai - 600 056.4.The Commissioner, Land Reforms, State of Tamil Nadu, Land Reforms Commissioner Office, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.5.The Assistant Commissioner, Land Reforms, Villupuram, Villupuram District.6.Chandra Sekaran7.S.Chandra Baskara Marthandan ... RespondentsPrayer in C.M.P.No.18640 of 2021 : Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure to implead the petitioner/third party as a respondent in the above Writ Appeal in W.A.No.1756 of 2021.Prayer in W.A.No.1756 of 2021 : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 28.11.2019 in W.P.No.33509 of 2013 on the file of this Court. For Petitioner:Mr.S.Thanka SivanFor R1 to R5:Mr.T.ChezhianAdditional Government PleaderFor R7:Mr.M.K.KabirSenior CounselPage 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.18640 of 2021in W.A.No.1756 of 2021for M/s.T.JayaramanFor R6:No appearanceO R D E R(Order of the Court was made by S.S. SUNDAR, J.)This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to implead the petitioner/third party as a respondent in the above Writ Appeal.2.Though this petition is seriously opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, in view of the fact that the petitioner in this impleading petition has filed a Civil Suit in respect of the same property, this Court finds that he may be a proper party for an effective adjudication. Hence, this petition is ordered. 3.Post the main Writ Appeal next week for hearing.(S.S.S.R., J.) (P.D.B., J.) 06.12.2024mknPage 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.No.18640 of 2021in W.A.No.1756 of 2021Internet : YesS.S. SUNDAR , J. andP. DHANABAL , J. mknC.M.P.No.18640 of 2021in W.A.No.1756 of 202106.12.2024Page 4

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments