Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 66.B.Thenmozhi,W/o. Balasubramanian, Door No. 323, Selva Nagar, Vengikkal-Town, Thiruvannamalai District -606 604. Respondent(s)PRAYERWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 not to transfer patta for the property of the…
Judgment
WP No. 15469 of 2023IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-04-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYWP No. 15469 of 2023AND WMP NO. 15022 OF 20231. S.ValliD/o. Shanmuga Mudaliyar, Door No. 2/709, Grama Savadi Street, Devapandalam Village, Sankarapuram taluk, Kallakurichi District.
S.Asothai,D/o. Shanmuga Mudaliyar, Door No. 2/709, Grama Savadi Street, Devapandalam Village, Sankarapuram taluk, Kallakurichi District.
S.Pavalakodi,D/o. Shanmuga Mudaliyar, Door No. 2/709, Grama Savadi Street, Devapandalam Village, Sankarapuram taluk, Kallakurichi District.
S.Manimekalai,D/o. Shanmuga Mudaliyar, Door No. 2/709, Grama Savadi Street, Devapandalam Village, Sankarapuram taluk, Kallakurichi District. Petitioner(s)Vs1. The District CollectorOffice of The District collector, Kallakurichi Town, Kallakurichi District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15469 of 20232.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi Town, Kallakurichi District. 3. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Sankarapuram town and Taluk, Kallakurichi District. 4. The Village Administrative Officer, Office of the Village Administrative Officer, Devapandalam Village, sankarapuram taluk, Kallakurichi District.
N.MathiazhaganS/o. Nachiappan, Door No. 225/2, 4th Cross, KMS Garden, Alagapurampudur, Alagapuram-Town, Salem District - 636 016.
B.Thenmozhi,W/o. Balasubramanian, Door No. 323, Selva Nagar, Vengikkal-Town, Thiruvannamalai District -606 604. Respondent(s)PRAYERWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 not to transfer patta for the property of the petitioner by considering and passing orders on the Representation of the petitioners dated 22.4.2023For Petitioner(s):Mr.K.SelvarajFor Respondent(s):Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP for R1 to 4Mr.K.Govi Ganesan, for R5 & 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15469 of 2023ORDERThis writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.04.2023.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner has given a representation, requesting the respondents 1 to 4 not to transfer the patta for the property of the petitioner till the disposal of the suit pending between the petitioner and the private respondents.
However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition.3. In reply, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner's representation dated 22.04.2023 will be disposed of by the concerned respondent within a period of 12 weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents and also perused the entire materials available on record.5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15469 of 2023representation of the petitioner dated 22.04.2023 and after issuing notice to the 5th & 6th respondents, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.6.
Operative part
With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.24-04-2026nsaIndex: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet: YesNeutral Citation: Yes/NoTo1.The District CollectorOffice of The District collector, Kallakurichi Town, Kallakurichi District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kallakurichi Town, Kallakurichi District. 3. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Sankarapuram tow and Taluk, Kallakurichi District. 4. The Village Administrative Officer, Office of the Village Administrative Officer, Devapandalam Village, sankarapuram taluk, Kallakurichi District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 15469 of 2023KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.nsaWP No. 15469 of 202324-04-2026
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.