High Court · 2025

W.P.No.17697 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.06.2025Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan RamasamyW.P.No.17697 of 2025andW.M.P.Nos.19979 & 19980 of 2025Deccan Games Private Limited,Rep. by its Director,PITCHAI MUTHUNo.1, 5th Floor, F NOV VC, Rashmi Towers,Village Road,Valluvarkottam High Road,Nungambakkam, Chennai-600034. ...Petitioner Vs.Assistant Commissioner Commercial Taxes Department,Valluvarkottam Assessment CircleValluvarkottam:Chennai-III,121 M G Road, Nungambakkam,Chennai 600 034. ...Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned Order-in-Original Reference 1/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17697 of 2025No.ZD3312231027670 dated 14.12.2023 along with the proceedings bearing GSTIN/33AAECD7909C2ZX/2017-18 dated 14.12.2023 issued by the Respondent herein and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondent to reassess the input tax credit in respect of the supply of goods and services claimed by the Respondent in Form GSTR3B as the case may be by providing an opportunity to the petitioner.For Petitioner: Mr.S.PatrickFor Respondent : Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran Government Advocate (Taxes) Order Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate (Taxes), who takes notice on behalf of the respondent. With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order dated 14.12.2023 passed by the respondent for the AY 2017-18 and to quash the same and also for a consequential direction to the respondent to reassess the input tax credit in respect of the supply of goods and services claimed by the Respondent in Form GSTR3B as the case may be by providing an opportunity to the petitioner.2/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17697 of 20253. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent has issued a show cause notice on 23.09.2023 followed by two reminder notices dated 10.11.2023 and 18.11.2023 by uploading the same in the GST portal without serving physical copy to the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner was not aware of the same and failed to submit its reply. Since the petitioner failed to file reply to the said show cause notice, the respondent has confirmed the proposals contained in the show cause notice and passed the present impugned order. Therefore, the learned counsel would submit that the impugned order suffers from violation of principles of natural justice and is liable to be aside, as the petitioner has not been heard before passing the impugned order. 3.1. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit 25% of the disputed tax, in the event, this Court is inclined to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter back to the Authority for fresh consideration. 3/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17697 of 20254. The learned Government Advocate (Taxes) for the respondent fairly submitted that since the petitioner has voluntarily come forward to deposit 25% of the disputed tax, the prayer sought for by the petitioner may be considered. 5. Considering the above submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and upon perusal of the materials, it is evident that the impugned show cause notice was uploaded on the GST Portal Tab. According to the petitioner, the petitioner was not aware of the issuance of the show cause notice issued through the GST Portal and the original of the said show cause notice was not furnished to them. In such circumstances, this Court is of the view that the impugned assessment order came to be passed without affording any opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, confirming the proposals contained in the show cause notice. 6. No doubt sending notice by uploading in portal is a sufficient service, but, the Officer who is sending the repeated reminders, inspite of the fact that no response from the petitioner to the show cause notices etc., 4/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17697 of 2025the Officer should have applied his/her mind and explored the possibility of sending notices by way of other modes prescribed in Section 169 of the GST Act, which are also the valid mode of service under the Act, otherwise it will not be an effective service, rather, it would only fulfilling the empty formalities. Merely passing an ex parte order by fulfilling the empty formalities will not serve any useful purpose and the same will only pave way for multiplicity of litigations, not only wasting the time of the Officer concerned, but also the precious time of the Appellate Authority/Tribunal and this Court as well. Thus, when there is no response from the tax payer to the notice sent through a particular mode, the Officer who is issuing notices should strictly explore the possibilities of sending notices through some other mode as prescribed in Section 169(1) of the Act, preferably by way of RPAD, which would ultimately achieve the object of the GST Act.7. Therefore, this Court finds that there is a lack of opportunities being provided to serve the notices/orders etc., effectively to the petitioner. Hence, this Court is inclined to set-aside the impugned order with terms, by issuing the following directions:-5/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17697 of 2025i) The impugned order passed by the respondent dated 14.12.2023 is set aside. ii)Consequently, the matter is remanded to the respondent for fresh consideration. iii) The petitioner is granted liberty to deposit 25% of the disputed tax, which the petitioner themselves had voluntarily came forward to make such payment, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. iv) Thereafter, the petitioner is directed to file a reply along with supportive documents within a period of two weeks. v) Thereupon, the respondent is directed to consider the reply and shall issue a clear 14 days notice affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and shall decide the matter in accordance with law. 6/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17697 of 20258. With the above observations & directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 03.06.2025 (½)arrIndex : yes/noNeutral Citation : yes/no7/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17697 of 2025ToAssistant Commissioner Commercial Taxes Department,Valluvarkottam Assessment CircleValluvarkottam:Chennai-III,121 M G Road, Nungambakkam,Chennai 600 034.8/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.17697 of 2025 Krishnan Ramasamy,J.,arrW.P.No.17697 of 2025 03.06.20259/9