N.Tamilmani v. The Industries Commissioner and Director of Industries and Commerce,SIDCO Corporate Office BuildingGuindy
Case at a glance
- Bench
- V BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
W.P.No.15229 of 2023IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 12.04.2024CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYANW.P.No.15229 of 2023and W.M.P.Nos.14737 & 14738 of 2023N.Tamilmani ...PetitionerVs.
The Industries Commissioner and Director of Industries and Commerce, SIDCO Corporate Office BuildingGuindy, Chennai -32.
The General Manager, District Registrar of Industrial Cooperative SocietiesDistries Industries Centre, Salem-4.
N.Shobana ...RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings passed in viz., 10RC.No.926/IC1/2022 dated 14.12.2022 on the file of the 2nd respondent, 2)RC.No.8053/ICB/2022-1 dated 22.12.2022 on the file of the 1st respondent, 3)RC.No.1182/IC1/2022 dated 27.12.2022 on the file of the 2nd respondent and the subsequent summon issued by the 3rd respondent dated 18.04.2023.For Petitioner : Mr.V.ElangovanFor resppondents: Mrs.P.Vijayadevi, GA for R1.Mr.G.Ilamurugan – R2.No appearance for R3.Page 1 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15229 of 2023
Operative part
O R D E RThe learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, made a submission that the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.12.04.2024tshInternet : Yes Index : Yes Speaking order : Yes / NoTo1.The Industries Commissioner and Director of Industries and Commerce, SIDCO Corporate Office BuildingGuindy, Chennai -32.2.The General Manager, District Registrar of Industrial Cooperative SocietiesDistries Industries Centre, Salem-4.Page 2 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15229 of 2023V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.tshW.P.No.15229 of 202312.04.2024Page 3 of 3
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.