D.Munikrishnan v. The Collector Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District & Ors.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.11.2009CORAM:THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.CHANDRUW.P.Nos.6937, 7142 and 19272 of 2009& M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2009D.Munikrishnan.. Petitioner in W.P.No.6937/2009Tiruvarur Consumer CooperativeWholesale Stores Employees UnionRep.by its PresidentM.SoundararajanNo.21, Melavadambookki StreetTiruvarur 610 001.. Petitioner in W.P.Nos.7142 & 19272 of 2009Vs.

The CollectorKrishnagiri, Krishnagiri District2.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative SocietiesDharmapuri, Dharmapuri District3. The Cooperative Sub Registrar/Special OfficerS.527, Kelamangalam Agricultural ProducersCooperative Marketing Society Ltd.,Kelamangalam P.ODenkanikottai TalukKrishnagiri DistrictPIN 635 113 .. Respondents 1 to 3 in W.P.No.6937/20094.The District CollectorNagapattinam5.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative SocietiesNagapattinam RegionCollectorate ComplexNagapattinam https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Deputy Registrar/Special OfficerT.860, Tiruvarur ConsumerCooperative Wholesale Stores Ltd.,No.21, Melavadambookki StreetTiruvarur 610 0017.The Special OfficerNagapatinam Public ServantsCooperative StoresPublic Office Road.. Respondents 1 to 4 Nagapattinam in W.P.No.7142/20098.The Registrar of Cooperative SocietiesN.V.N.MaaligaiNo.170, Periyar E.V.R.SalaiKilpaukMadras 600 0109.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative SocietiesNagapattinam RegionCollectorate ComplexNagapattinam10. T.860 Thiruvarur ConsumerCooperative Wholesale Stores Ltd.,Rep.by its Special OfficerThiruvarur 610 001Thiruvarur District11.Mayiladuthurai ConsumerCooperative Wholesale Stores Ltd.,Rep by its Special OfficerMayiladuthurai Taluk.. Respondents 1 to 4Nagapattinam District in W.P.No.19272/2009(3rd & 4th respondent impleadedas per order dated 3.11.2009 inM.P.Nos.3 and 4 of 2009)Prayer in W.P.No.6937/2009 :Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugend order of the third respondent in proceedings No.Nil dated 31-03-2009 and quash the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned. Prayer in W.P.No.7142/2009 :Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the ist respondent herein in his proceedings Na.Ka5754/2009/M.1 dated 27.3.2009 and quash the same. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Prayer in W.P.No.19272/2009 :Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 2nd respondent herein in his proceedingsNa.Ka.6558/97/E.T. dated 02.09.2009 and quash the same. For Petitioner :: Mr.P.Mohanraj in W.P.No.6937 of 2009Mr.S.Kasirajan in WPs.7142 & 19272 of 2009 For Respondents :: Mr.R.Neelakandan, G.A. For R1 & R2 in all W.Ps Mr.M.S.Palansamy for R3 in W.P.No.7142/2009 R3 in W.P.No.6937 of 2009 R4 in W.P.Nos.19272/2009 Ms.V.Bhavani Subbarayan for R4 in W.P.No.7142/2009

O R D E RIn these three Writ Petitions, the challenge is to the action of the District Collector in ordering transfer of Public DistributionSystem to some other society.2. In W.P.No.6937 of 2009, the petitioner is a SalesAssistant in in Kelamangalam Agricultural Producers CooperativeMarketing Society. The petitioner was informed by an order dated31.3.2009 that he was relieved from the service of the Society on the ground that the petitioner should report to another PrimaryAgricultural Cooperative Society, wherein the business of running fair price shops was culled out. Apart from the fact that such aWrit Petition is not maintainable, Mr.P.Mohanraj, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that by virtue of this order, the petitioner will have to lose employment and therefore he is attacking the policy of the transfer of fair price shop to some other society as unjustified.3. In W.P.No.7142 of 2009, the case is filed by Trade Unionrepresenting the employees of the Cooperative Wholesale Storeschallenging the action of the District Collector in transferring the Public Distribution System to another public service cooperative stores.4.

In W.P.No.19272 of 2009, it is the very same petitioner, who challenged the order dated 2.9.2009 issued by the Joint Director of Cooperative Societies, Thiruvarur Region. By the said order, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ work done by the earlier societies with reference to the public distribution system was handed over to a new society. Mr.S.Kasirajan, learned counsel for the petitioner referred to Section 13 of the Cooperative Societies Act. It is stated that the procedures contemplated therein have not been followed in doing the transfer. Secondly, he submitted that the members of the Union are likely to lose the employment, in view of the transfer of their business of public distribution system to some other society. He also submitted that the new society is not having enough wherewithal to conduct such business.5. Mr.M.S.Palaniswamy, learned counsel for the impleadedsocieties submitted that the petitioners have not challenged the basic order dated 22.9.2009, in which the decision was taken to transfer on the basis of administrative grounds to various societies.

Apart from the fact, he also submitted that it is not open either to the employees of the society or to the trade union to challenge such action. It is beyond the purview of any judicial review.6. In this context, Ms.M.S.Palanisamy, learned counsel for theimpleaded societies referred to the judgment of this Court in theV.L.Spl.200 Arakonam Agricultural Cooperative Bank rep.by itsSecretary K.Rajendran vs. the Registrar of Cooperative Societies and others reported in 1999 W.L.R.471. In that case, this Court had held that a Cooperative Society being a dealer cannot dictate to the Government or to the Rationing authorities that the number of Cardholders should not be reduced at any point of time. Thereafter, in paragraph 8, it has been observed as follows: "Merely because an entrustment was made to another Society, taking into consideration the financial difficulties of aparticular Society, the Authorities are not barred from returning back the dealership to the earlier dealer when his financial position has improved. Why the authorities insist on financial position is, that the consumer public should not suffer, and it is not preference of another dealer in one's place. "By saying so, the petition filed by the Cooperative Society was rejected.

Mr.M.S.Palaniswamy, learned counsel also brought to the notice of this Court an unreported judgment in the Tamil Nadu CooperativeMarketing Societies Employees Association (Virudhachalam Unit) rep.byits Secretary vs. the District Collector and others in W.P.No.35605 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ of 2002 dated 28.11.2002. In that case, K.P.Sivasubramaniam,J held that in such matters, the workers have no locus stnadi to question such orders and it was for the Society or any of its members of the Society to take up the issue.

In respect of the very same Cooperative Society, a case was filed before this Court in W.P.No.14360 of 2000 in T.G.Saravanan vs.the Registrar of Cooperative Societies and others dated 15.11.2007.In that case, this Court in paragraph 6 held as follows: "6. No cause of action has arisen for the petitioner to challenge the same in the present case. Even before any effective steps could be taken by the respondents, the petitioner has rushed to this Court and got a stay order even for the proposal made by the third respondent. However, the learned counsel was fair enough to cite the judgment of this Court in ARAKONAM PRIMARY AGRICULTURALCOOPERATIVE BANK VS. THE REGISTRART OF COOPERATIVESOCIETIES & OTHERS reported in 1999 WRIT L.R.471, where the question was whether the fair price shops running under the Cooperative Societies dealing with the essential commodities, can be transferred. In this context, this court has held that the society has no vested right over the essential commodities. In any event, this court finds that there are no merits in the Writ Petition. "

The public distribution system, which is also running fair price shops is not directly coming under the business of the Cooperative Society. On the contrary, it is an additional work furnished to the societies not under the provisions of the Cooperative Societies Act but by the orders of the District Collectorfunctioning under the Essential Commodities Act. Therefore, if part of the business which was given as additional business to the society is transferred, the employees cannot challenge on the ground that itis likely to result in their retrenchment. Therefore, the decision taken by the authorities outside the Cooperative Society could not also be interfered with at the instance of the petitioners.

Even in cases where the employer himself decides either to disown or disengage such a business and whether the employees would have got locus standi to question such decision came to be considered by the Supreme Court in M/s.Parry and Co.Ltd. Vs P.C.Pal, Judge of the Second Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta and others reported in AIR1970 SC 1334. The Supreme Court held that it is the managerial discretion of an employer to organise and arrange his business in the manner he considers best. So long as that was done bona fide, it was https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ not competent for the Tribunal to question its propriety. If such ascheme of reorgnaisation results in surplus stage of employees, the employer is not expected to carry the burden of such economic liability. Therefore, the locus standi of the employees to question such managerial decision of the employer itself cannot be questioned.

In the present case, it was not even the decision of the respective Cooperative Society. But, on the contrary, the decision was taken outside and over which business, the society itself has no say as held by this Court in the earlier decision referred to above.

In the light of the above, all the three Writ Petitions stand dismissed. However, there will be no order as to costs. Theconnected Miscellaneous Petitions stand closed. Sd/Asst. Registrar/true copy/Sub Asst. RegistrarajrTo1.The CollectorKrishnagiri, Krishnagiri District2.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative SocietiesDharmapuri, Dharmapuri District3. The Cooperative Sub Registrar/Special OfficerS.527, Kelamangalam Agricultural ProducersCooperative Marketing Society Ltd.,Kelamangalam P.ODenkanikottai TalukKrishnagiri DistrictPIN 635 113 4. The District CollectorNagapattinam https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Joint Registrar of Cooperative SocietiesNagapattinam RegionCollectorate ComplexNagapattinam6. The Deputy Registrar/Special OfficerT.860, Tiruvarur ConsumerCooperative Wholesale Stores Ltd.,No.21, Melavadambookki StreetTiruvarur 610 0017.The Special OfficerNagapatinam Public ServantsCooperative StoresPublic Office RoadNagapattinam 8. The Registrar of Cooperative SocietiesN.V.N.MaaligaiNo.170, Periyar E.V.R.SalaiKilpauk, Madras 600 0109.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative SocietiesNagapattinam RegionCollectorate ComplexNagapattinam10.The Special Officer T.860 Thiruvarur ConsumerCooperative Wholesale Stores Ltd.,Thiruvarur 610 001Thiruvarur District11.The Special Officer Mayiladuthurai ConsumerCooperative Wholesale Stores Ltd.,Mayiladuthurai TalukNagapattinam District1 cc To M/s.P.Rajendran, Advocate, SR.585801 cc To Mr.S.Kasirajan, Advocate, SR.585411 CC to the Government Pleader SR NO.586913 ccs To Mr.M.S.Palaniswamy, Advocate, SR.58576W.P.Nos.6937, 7142and 19272 of 2009BVN(CO)sra 24.11.2009