M. Rajan (Deceased)1.Sivapriya. R2.R. Yuvan Goutham3.Mithual Rajan v. Janakiammal (Deceased)1.Prema Rengachari2.Shanthi Ravindran3.Vijayalakshmi Srinivas
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, this Application is allowed
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the documents can be received subject to proof, admissibility and relevancy. Accordingly, this Application is allowed. 17.07.2026Neutral Citation :Yes/NoAT https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A. No. 2009 of 20263/3A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.ATA. No. 2009 of 2026 inC.S. No. 616 of 201817.07.2025
Judgment
A. No. 2009 of 20261/3IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.07.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETEA. No. 2009 of 2026inC.S. No. 616 of 2018M. Rajan (Deceased)
Sivapriya. R2.R. Yuvan Goutham3.Mithual Rajan.. Applicants VsJanakiammal (Deceased)1.Prema Rengachari2.Shanthi Ravindran3.Vijayalakshmi Srinivas.. RespondentsApplication is filed to receive the documents stated in the application as additional documents in the above suit. For Applicants: Mr. J. NandagopalFor Respondents: Mr. V. Anand https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A. No. 2009 of 20262/3
O R D E RThis Application has been filed to receive the documents stated in the application as additional documents in the above suit.
The learned counsel for the applicants submits that all documents sought to be received are original certified copies, including Document Nos.12, 13 and 16. The original document Nos.12, 13 and 16 were shown to this Court and the learned counsel undertakes to produce the originals at the time of trial. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that, as stated in the counter affidavit, the documents are fabricated and not genuine.
As regards the authenticity, relevance and proof of the said documents, they are matters to be decided during the course of trial.
Operative part
Therefore, this Court is of the view that the documents can be received subject to proof, admissibility and relevancy. Accordingly, this Application is allowed. 17.07.2026Neutral Citation :Yes/NoAT https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A. No. 2009 of 20263/3A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.ATA. No. 2009 of 2026 inC.S. No. 616 of 201817.07.2025
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.