The Commissioner Of Income TaxChennai v. Smt Vandana Suresh BhandariNo.44/3 Narayana Mudali Street
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S S SUNDAR, C SARAVANAN
Outcome
Withdrawn
Recording the submissions made by the learned counsels on either side, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
TCA NO. 381 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDARANDTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANANTCA NO. 381 of 2021 The Commissioner Of Income TaxChennai..AppellantVsSmt Vandana Suresh BhandariNo.44/3 Narayana Mudali Street, Sowcarpet, Chennai-600079 ...RespondentPrayer : This Appeal is filed under Memorandum of Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 19.03.2020 in ITA No. 2854/Chny/2019.For Appellant: Mr. T.Ravi KumarFor Respondent: M/s. G.Vardini KarthikJUDGMENT(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S.Sundar J.)Learned counsels appearing on either side state that the assessee has availed the benefit under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 and submitted Form I and the assessee also received Form II. It is also represented that From III has been https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.S.SUNDAR,J. and C.SARAVANAN, J. akreceived and the payment intimation has been given to the assessee. Hence, the learned senior standing counsel appearing for the appellant department seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal.2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsels on either side, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. In case, for any reason, the assessee has failed to pay the amount, liberty is preserved to the department to seek restoration of this appeal. (S.S.SUNDAR J.) (C.SARAVANAN J.) 03-03-2025Index : YesInternet :Yes/NoakTCA NO. 381 of 2021
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the submissions made by the learned counsels on either side, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Income Tax Act, 1961.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.