M/s.CKR Retail Private Limited(previously known as M/s.Cavinkare Private Limited)Represented by its Director v. Ms.Sipra Nanda
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
2025 in this application is made absolute and this application is allowed as prayed for
Provisions considered
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 s. 9(2)(a)(d)
Judgment
Original Application No. 364 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 04.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSEOriginal Application No. 364 of 2025M/s.CKR Retail Private Limited(previously known as M/s.Cavinkare Private Limited)Represented by its Director Mr.R.GopalakrishnanHaving its registered office at No.12Cenotaph Road, TeynampetChennai – 600018. … PetitionerVs.Ms.Sipra Nanda … RespondentPRAYER: Original Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 Original Side Rules read with Section 9(2)(a)(d) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to grant an order of interim injunction restraining the respondent or their men, agents, servants, authorised signatories, relatives from using the brand name ''Green Trends'' situated at No.1508, Puri Canal Road, Hanspal, Naharkanta, Bhubaneswar, Odisha – 752101. Page 1 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Original Application No. 364 of 2025 For Applicant : Mr.M.Dhanush For Respondent : Set exparte
Operative part
O R D E RNotice sent to the respondent has been duly served. The affidavit of service enclosing a delivery report has been filed. The same confirms that the respondent has received the notice. The name of the respondent is also printed in the cause-list today. Despite service of notice on the respondent, no one has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent. Hence, the respondent is set exparte by this Court. 2. The applicant is having the benefit of the order of interim injunction in this application since 09.04.2025. Since the respondent has been set exparte by this Court, the interim injunction granted by this Court on 09.04.2025 in this application is made absolute and this application is allowed as prayed for. 04.06.2025Index: Yes/ No Speaking order / Non speaking orderNeutral citation : Yes / NoMayaPage 2 of 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Original Application No. 364 of 2025ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.MayaOriginal Application No. 364 of 2025 Dated : 04.06.2025Page 3 of 3
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 2025 in this application is made absolute and this application is allowed as prayed for
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 9(2)(a)(d).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.