Writ Petition No. 3817 of 2010 · Madras High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, since, no further orders are necessary, this Writ Petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition isclosed. arrSd/-Asst. Registrar//True Copy//Sub Asst. RegistrarTo1. The Commissioner Connoor Municipality…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATE: 24.02.2010CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENWrit Petition No.3817 of 2010&M.P.No.1 of 2010N.Raj Kumar @ Kannan...... Petitioner -Vs-1. The Commissioner Connoor Municipality Coonnoor2. The District Collector Nilgiris District Nilgiris...... Respondents Prayer: This petition has been filed praying for a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents, their men, agents, subordinates, officers or any one acting under them from not in any manner demolish, remove or alter the building put by the petitioner situate at Ward No.B,Block No.30, T.S.No.7/1, 7/3A,(7/3A2), Railey Compound, Mount Road, Coonoor-1, NilgirisDistrict other than by due process contemplated under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920. For Petitioner : M/s.T.T.Ravichandran For Respondents : Mr.R.Murali Government Advocate.
O R D E RThis Writ Petition has been filed, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the respondents and others from, in any manner demolishing, removing or altering the building put up by the petitioner, at Ward No.B,Block No.30, T.S.No.7/1, 7/3A,(7/3A2), Railey Compound, Mount Road, Coonoor, NilgirisDistrict, other than by following the due process of law, as contemplated under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu DistrictMunicipalities Act, 1920. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
At this stage of the hearing of the Writ Petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents had submitted that, if the respondents are going to demolish, remove or alter the building in question, it would be done only by following the due process of law.
In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, since, no further orders are necessary, this Writ Petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition isclosed. arrSd/-Asst. Registrar//True Copy//Sub Asst. RegistrarTo1. The Commissioner Connoor Municipality Coonnoor2. The District Collector Nilgiris District Nilgiris+ 1 cc to Mr. R. Murali, Advocate SR No.12467+ 1 cc to Mr. T.T. Ravichandran, Advocate SR No.12520+ 1 cc to Government Pleader, SR No.12855KA(CO)SR/25.2.2010Writ Petition No.3817 of 2010
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.