High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
W.P.No.14474 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.04.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESHANDTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMARW.P.No.14474 of 2025and W.M.P.No.16354 of 20251.The Chairman & Managing Director,Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,Bharat Sanchar Bhavan, H.C. Mathur Lane,Janpath, New Delhi – 110 001. 2.The Chief General Manager (Telephones),O/o. Chief General Manager (Telephones),Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,Tamil Nadu Circle, BSNL,No.16, Greams Road, 6th Floor Link,Chennai – 600 006.3.Chief General Manager (Mtee),Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,O/o. Chief General Manager (Mtee),Southern Telecom Region,No.11, Link Road, Ganapathy Colony,Guindy, Chennai.Page 1 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 20254.The Accountant Officer (HQCO) IFA,Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,O/o. Chief General Manager (Mtee),Southern Telecom Region,No.11, Link Road, Ganapathy Colony,Guindy, Chennai.... PetitionersVs.1.P.Velayudham2.Government of India,Ministry of Communication & IT,Department of Telecommunications,Under Secretary (STP) (Pension Section),Sanchar Bhawan, 20, Ashoka Road,New Delhi.... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, culminating with it order dated 21.11.2023 passed in O.A.No.1004 of 2021 and quash the same.For Petitioners: Mr.M.VaidyanathanFor Respondents: Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John Page 2 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 2025ORDER(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.)Heard Mr.M.Vaidyanathan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. In view of the final order to be passed in this Writ Petition, notice to the respondents herein is dispensed with. 2. In an identical matter, order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as CAT), was challenged before this Court in W.P.No.3263 of 2024 and a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court through order dated 12.03.2024, had rejected the Writ Petition in the following manner:-“This Writ Petition had been preferred by the department, wherein, the tribunal had set aside the order of the fourth petitioner dated 10.11.2020 and a consequential direction to the petitioners to restore the presidential order of absorption dated 31.12.2001 and a further declaration that the second respondent herein is an employee of erst while department of telecommunication who had been subsequently absorbed in BSNL and entitled to the benefits of Rule Page 3 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 202537A of CCS pension Rules and with a further direction to the petitioner to restore the right of the second respondent to subscribe towards GPF and accordingly transfer the EPF accumulations to the GPF account and permit him to continue to contribute in GPF. 2. Heard Mr.M.Vaidhiyanathan, learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. He would submit that the second respondent herein was appointed as a Telecom Operating Assistant in September 2000 on compassionate grounds. Further on successful completion of the training, the second respondent was posted as a temporary telecom Office Assistant. In the interregnum, the BSNL came to be formed and the employees of the department of telecommunication were transferred to BSNL. Since the second respondent was only a trainee and not holding any post and he having successfully completed his training, pursuant to the BSNL being formed, he would be only treated as an employee of BSNL and therefore he could be entitled to only EPF. But, however, by a wrong understanding, a presidential order of absorption had been issued in favour of the second respondent as being permanently absorbed on and from 01.10.2000 and that based upon his option, he was permitted to become a member of the General Provident Fund as Page 4 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 2025provided under Sub Rule 24 (2) of Rule 37A of CCS pension rules. When this had came to the light of the department, an order dated 10.11.2020 was issued and the presidential order dated 30.01.2012 was cancelled and he was treated as a BSNL recruite. Therefore, he would submit that there is no error on the part of the petitioners in passing the order impugned before the Tribunal. But, however, the Tribunal on erroneously considering of the facts, had set aside the order by holding that the second respondent is entitled to receive to be a member of the General Provident Fund and by restoring the presidential order dated 31.12.2001. Therefore, he would seek interference of this Court. 4. We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the materials available on record before this Court. 5. From the typed set of papers, we had gone through the communication, dated 16.01.2003 issued by the Corporate Account Section of the BSNL, which reads as follows:- “…. 2. The persons who are/ will be appointed by BSNL on compassionate ground on or after 01.10.2000 as nominees of the employees of DOT/ DTS/ DTO died in harness up to 30.09.2000 will come under General Provident Scheme and not under EPF/ CPF Scheme.” Page 5 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 20256. Clause 2 of the said communication indicates that the persons who are and will be appointed by the BSNL on compassionate grounds on or after 01.10.2000 as nominee of the employees of DOT/DTS/DTO who died in harness up to 30.09.2000 will come under the General Provident Fund and not under EPF/ CPF Scheme. 7. The case of the petitioner is that even though he was originally appointed on compassionate grounds by the DOT in September 2000, since he was only a trainee, the appointment of the second respondent which happened after 01.10.2000 could only be treated as an appointment by the BSNL and not an appointment by the DOT. Even if the case of the petitioners are to be accepted, even then, when a compassionate appointment which is made after 01.10.2000 of a nominee of an employee of DOT who had died in harness prior to 30.09.2000 would only be governed by the General Provident Fund. This communication has not been withdrawn, rescinded or modified. In that aspect, the reason assigned in the order dated 10.11.2001 canceling the presidential order of the second respondent could also not substantiate the case of the petitioners to deny the benefit of the General Provident Fund Scheme to the Page 6 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 2025second respondent. The said issue had also been considered by a Co-ordinate Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in C.W.P.No.14911-CAT of 2010 dated 20.08.2010 and C.W.P.No.14802 of 2010 dated 19.08.2010, wherein, the Co-ordinate Bench had up held the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal Chandhigarh, where similar issue had been considered.8. As we have already held that even if the presidential order is rescinded, in view of the communication extracted supra, we are of the view that the second respondent would be entitled to only the benefits of the General Provident Fund and not EPF/ CPF as claimed by the petitioners. 9. For the foregoing reasons, we do not find any infirmity or illegality in the impugned orders before us.10. In fine, this Writ Petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.”3. Admittedly, the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is same as issue involved in WP.No.3263 of 2024 dated 12.03.2024. Page 7 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 20254. In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [M.S.R, J.] [N.S, J.] 24.04.2025Index: Yes/NoSpeaking order/Non-speaking orderSniPage 8 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 2025ToUnder Secretary (STP) (Pension Section),Ministry of Communication & IT,Department of Telecommunications,Sanchar Bhawan, 20, Ashoka Road,New Delhi.Page 9 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 2025M.S.RAMESH, J.andN. SENTHILKUMAR, J.SniW.P.No.14474 of 202524.04.2025Page 10 of 10
W.P.No.14474 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.04.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESHANDTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMARW.P.No.14474 of 2025and W.M.P.No.16354 of 20251.The Chairman & Managing Director,Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,Bharat Sanchar Bhavan, H.C. Mathur Lane,Janpath, New Delhi – 110 001. 2.The Chief General Manager (Telephones),O/o. Chief General Manager (Telephones),Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,Tamil Nadu Circle, BSNL,No.16, Greams Road, 6th Floor Link,Chennai – 600 006.3.Chief General Manager (Mtee),Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,O/o. Chief General Manager (Mtee),Southern Telecom Region,No.11, Link Road, Ganapathy Colony,Guindy, Chennai.Page 1 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 20254.The Accountant Officer (HQCO) IFA,Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited,O/o. Chief General Manager (Mtee),Southern Telecom Region,No.11, Link Road, Ganapathy Colony,Guindy, Chennai.... PetitionersVs.1.P.Velayudham2.Government of India,Ministry of Communication & IT,Department of Telecommunications,Under Secretary (STP) (Pension Section),Sanchar Bhawan, 20, Ashoka Road,New Delhi.... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal, culminating with it order dated 21.11.2023 passed in O.A.No.1004 of 2021 and quash the same.For Petitioners: Mr.M.VaidyanathanFor Respondents: Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John Page 2 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 2025ORDER(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.)Heard Mr.M.Vaidyanathan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. In view of the final order to be passed in this Writ Petition, notice to the respondents herein is dispensed with. 2. In an identical matter, order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as CAT), was challenged before this Court in W.P.No.3263 of 2024 and a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court through order dated 12.03.2024, had rejected the Writ Petition in the following manner:-“This Writ Petition had been preferred by the department, wherein, the tribunal had set aside the order of the fourth petitioner dated 10.11.2020 and a consequential direction to the petitioners to restore the presidential order of absorption dated 31.12.2001 and a further declaration that the second respondent herein is an employee of erst while department of telecommunication who had been subsequently absorbed in BSNL and entitled to the benefits of Rule Page 3 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 202537A of CCS pension Rules and with a further direction to the petitioner to restore the right of the second respondent to subscribe towards GPF and accordingly transfer the EPF accumulations to the GPF account and permit him to continue to contribute in GPF. 2. Heard Mr.M.Vaidhiyanathan, learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. He would submit that the second respondent herein was appointed as a Telecom Operating Assistant in September 2000 on compassionate grounds. Further on successful completion of the training, the second respondent was posted as a temporary telecom Office Assistant. In the interregnum, the BSNL came to be formed and the employees of the department of telecommunication were transferred to BSNL. Since the second respondent was only a trainee and not holding any post and he having successfully completed his training, pursuant to the BSNL being formed, he would be only treated as an employee of BSNL and therefore he could be entitled to only EPF. But, however, by a wrong understanding, a presidential order of absorption had been issued in favour of the second respondent as being permanently absorbed on and from 01.10.2000 and that based upon his option, he was permitted to become a member of the General Provident Fund as Page 4 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 2025provided under Sub Rule 24 (2) of Rule 37A of CCS pension rules. When this had came to the light of the department, an order dated 10.11.2020 was issued and the presidential order dated 30.01.2012 was cancelled and he was treated as a BSNL recruite. Therefore, he would submit that there is no error on the part of the petitioners in passing the order impugned before the Tribunal. But, however, the Tribunal on erroneously considering of the facts, had set aside the order by holding that the second respondent is entitled to receive to be a member of the General Provident Fund and by restoring the presidential order dated 31.12.2001. Therefore, he would seek interference of this Court. 4. We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the materials available on record before this Court. 5. From the typed set of papers, we had gone through the communication, dated 16.01.2003 issued by the Corporate Account Section of the BSNL, which reads as follows:- “…. 2. The persons who are/ will be appointed by BSNL on compassionate ground on or after 01.10.2000 as nominees of the employees of DOT/ DTS/ DTO died in harness up to 30.09.2000 will come under General Provident Scheme and not under EPF/ CPF Scheme.” Page 5 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 20256. Clause 2 of the said communication indicates that the persons who are and will be appointed by the BSNL on compassionate grounds on or after 01.10.2000 as nominee of the employees of DOT/DTS/DTO who died in harness up to 30.09.2000 will come under the General Provident Fund and not under EPF/ CPF Scheme. 7. The case of the petitioner is that even though he was originally appointed on compassionate grounds by the DOT in September 2000, since he was only a trainee, the appointment of the second respondent which happened after 01.10.2000 could only be treated as an appointment by the BSNL and not an appointment by the DOT. Even if the case of the petitioners are to be accepted, even then, when a compassionate appointment which is made after 01.10.2000 of a nominee of an employee of DOT who had died in harness prior to 30.09.2000 would only be governed by the General Provident Fund. This communication has not been withdrawn, rescinded or modified. In that aspect, the reason assigned in the order dated 10.11.2001 canceling the presidential order of the second respondent could also not substantiate the case of the petitioners to deny the benefit of the General Provident Fund Scheme to the Page 6 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 2025second respondent. The said issue had also been considered by a Co-ordinate Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in C.W.P.No.14911-CAT of 2010 dated 20.08.2010 and C.W.P.No.14802 of 2010 dated 19.08.2010, wherein, the Co-ordinate Bench had up held the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal Chandhigarh, where similar issue had been considered.8. As we have already held that even if the presidential order is rescinded, in view of the communication extracted supra, we are of the view that the second respondent would be entitled to only the benefits of the General Provident Fund and not EPF/ CPF as claimed by the petitioners. 9. For the foregoing reasons, we do not find any infirmity or illegality in the impugned orders before us.10. In fine, this Writ Petition is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.”3. Admittedly, the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is same as issue involved in WP.No.3263 of 2024 dated 12.03.2024. Page 7 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 20254. In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [M.S.R, J.] [N.S, J.] 24.04.2025Index: Yes/NoSpeaking order/Non-speaking orderSniPage 8 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 2025ToUnder Secretary (STP) (Pension Section),Ministry of Communication & IT,Department of Telecommunications,Sanchar Bhawan, 20, Ashoka Road,New Delhi.Page 9 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.14474 of 2025M.S.RAMESH, J.andN. SENTHILKUMAR, J.SniW.P.No.14474 of 202524.04.2025Page 10 of 10