Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In terms of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Harfunnisha4. A.Hafiz... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the Impugned notice having reference Na.Ka.No.1535/2025/B1 dated 27.03.2025, on the file of the second respondent, quash the…
Judgment
W.P.No.12460 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSEW.P.No.12460 of 2025and W.M.P.Nos.14048, 14052 & 14055 of 2025 Srinivasan... PetitionerVs.
The District Collector, District Collectorate, Kirshnagiri District.
The Sub-Collector, Office of the Sub-Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.
Operative part
Harfunnisha4. A.Hafiz... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the Impugned notice having reference Na.Ka.No.1535/2025/B1 dated 27.03.2025, on the file of the second respondent, quash the same. For Petitioner: Ms.U.RamyaFor Respondents For R1 & R2:Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government PleaderFor R3:Ms.S.R.SubaashiiniFor Mr.SR.SundarFor R4:Mr.S.KumaradevanPage No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12460 of 2025ORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has now become infructuous in view of the order dated 02.12.2025, passed in W.P.No.9278 of 2028. She has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. 2. In terms of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.05.01.2026Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non Speaking orderrtsPage No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12460 of 2025To1. The District Collector, District Collectorate, Kirshnagiri District.2. The Sub-Collector, Office of the Sub-Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12460 of 2025ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.rtsW.P.No.12460 of 2025 andW.M.P.Nos.14048, 14052 & 14055 of 202505.01.2026Page No.4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In terms of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.