K.Sampath Kumar v. The Managing Director
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 18.01.2011C O R A MThe Honourable Mr. Justice M.JAICHANDRENWrit Petition Nos.1046 and 1047 of 2006K.Sampath Kumar... Petitioner in both W.PsVersus1.The Managing Director, M/s.Sanco Trans Limited, P.B.No.1962, 90, Moore St., Chennai – 600 001.
The General Manager, M/s.Sanco Trans Limited, P.B.No.1962, 90, Moore St., Chennai – 600 001.
The Special Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Appellate Authority under the Tamil Nadu Shops & Establishments Act, 1947) Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.... Respondents in both W.PsPrayer in W.P.No.1046 of 2006 : Petition filed under Article 226of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order dated 14.06.2005passed by the third respondent in TSE NO.1/57/2001 and received bythe petitioner on 15.09.2005 and quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. Prayer in W.P.No.1047 of 2006 : Petition filed under Article 226of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order dated 19.09.2004passed by the third respondent in I.A.No.12/2004 in TSENO.1/57/2001 and quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary andunconstitutional. For Petitioner : Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar For RespondentsR1 and R2 : Mr.A.S.ThambusamyR3 : Mr.S.Gopinathan Additional Government Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ COMMON ORDERHeard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andthe learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and2 and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing onbehalf of the third respondent.2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petitions, thelearned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner hadsubmitted that a total sum of Rs.3,80,000/- had been paid to thepetitioner, as full and final settlement of the claims made in thewrit petitions.3. In view of the settlement arrived at between thepetitioner and the respondent Management, since, no further ordersare necessary, these writ petitions stand closed. No costs. Sd/- Asst. Registrar. /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar.cseTo1.The Special Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Appellate Authority under the Tamil Nadu Shops & Establishments Act, 1947) Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.1 cc to Mr.A.S. Ranganathan, Advocate, Sr. 31871 cc to Mr.C.K. Chandrasekar, Advocate, Sr. 32051 cc to Government Pleader, Sr. 3570W.P.Nos.1046 and 1047 of 2006TS (CO)kk 1/2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.