Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
petition is dismissed for want of prosecution
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 13.10.2020CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMARW.P.No.16807 of 2019 & W.M.P.No. 16404 of 2019 Sterling Biotech Staff Co operative Thriftand credit society Limited(REG NO X322) Sterling Biotech Factory Complex Sandynalla Nilgiris- 643237 Rep by its chairman K. Murthy. ...Petitioner -Vs-1 The Deputy Commissioner of Labour Authority Under the Shops and Establishments Act 1947 Coimbatore2 K. Mohammed Hussain ...Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari Callingfor the records of the 1st respondent relating to the Impugnedorder dated 11-6-2018 and quash the same as illegal and without Jurisdiction. For Petitioner : No appearanceFor Respondents : Mr.S.Saravanan – for R2
Operative part
O R D E RWhen this Writ Petition came up for hearing on06.10.2020, only the counsel for the second respondent appeared and there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it was directed to be listed today under the caption“for dismissal”. Accordingly, it is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.2. Today also when the case is called, no-one has appeared for the petitioner and only the counsel for the second respondent appeared. Since the petitioner's side has not shown interest to appear before this Court despite few chances given, this Court feels that, this Writ Petition can be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly the writPage numbers https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarKSTToThe Deputy Commissioner of Labour Authority Under the Shops and Establishments Act 1947, Coimbatore.+1cc to M/s.S.Saravanan, Advocate SR.33819 W.P.No.16807 of 2019GP(CO)CB(09/11/2020)Page numbers
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is dismissed for want of prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Shops and Establishments Act, 1947.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.