Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, this application is allowed as prayed for
Provisions considered
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 s. 29A(5)
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, this application is allowed as prayed for.06.06.2024arr
Judgment
A.No.2207 of 2024KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.,This application has been filed to extend the Mandate of the Arbitral tribunal by period of eight months under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that he has no objection in allowing this petition.
Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this application, this Court is inclined to extend the Mandate of the Arbitrator for a period of 8 months. Thus, the Mandate of the Arbitrator is extended by a further period of 8 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order, by the learned Arbitrator.
Operative part
Accordingly, this application is allowed as prayed for.06.06.2024arr
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this application is allowed as prayed for
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 29A(5).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.