Writ Petition No. 7198 of 2012 · Madras High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the abovedirections
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the abovedirections. No costs. Sd/ Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub. Asst. RegistrargpaTo1.The Special Committee Office of the Commercial Tax Department Ezhilagam Chepauk Chennai2.The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Chithode Circle ErodeWrit Petition No.7198 of 2012pa(co)pmk.2.5.2012
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28.03.2012 CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.7198 of 2012M/s.Sri Rajeswari Traders... Petitioner Vs1.The Special Committee Office of the Commercial Tax Department Ezhilagam Chepauk Chennai2.The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Chithode Circle Erode ... RespondentsPrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing thefirst respondent herein to pass orders on the petition filed by thepetitioner under Section 16-D of the Tamil Nadu General Sales TaxAct, 1959 for the assessment year 1996-97 under the Central Sales TaxAct, 1956 dated 31.10.2011 as expeditiously as possible. For petitioner : Mr.Hemalatha For respondents : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai Government Advocate (T)
O R D E R Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Government Advocate (Tax), takesnotice for the respondents.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner hadsubmitted that it would suffice, if the first respondent is directedto dispose of the petition filed by the petitioner, under Section 16-D of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, for the assessmentyear 1996-97, under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, dated31.10.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specifiedperiod.
The learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of therespondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.
In view of the submissions made by the learned counselsappearing on either side, the first respondent is directed to disposeof the petition filed by the petitioner, under Section 16-D of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, for the assessment year 1996-97, under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, dated 31.10.2011, onmerits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, notlater than three months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisorder. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the petitionfiled by the petitioner, under Section 16-D of the Tamil Nadu GeneralSales Tax Act, 1959, for the assessment year 1996-97, dated31.10.2011, to the first respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has notexpressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.
Operative part
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the abovedirections. No costs. Sd/ Asst. Registrar //True Copy// Sub. Asst. RegistrargpaTo1.The Special Committee Office of the Commercial Tax Department Ezhilagam Chepauk Chennai2.The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Chithode Circle ErodeWrit Petition No.7198 of 2012pa(co)pmk.2.5.2012
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the abovedirections
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.