G.Bhanumathi v. A.S.Raghunathan
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Review Application is dismissed for non-
Judgment
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY Review Application No.62 of 2012 Against A.S.No.759 of 2008 G.Bhanumathi ... Rev. Petitioner /Respondent v.
A.S.Raghunathan 2. A.S.Raja ... Respondents/Appellants Review Applications filed under Section XLII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 17.11.2011 made in A.S. No.759 of 2008 preferred against the order dated 30/12/2005 in O.S.No.3995 of 2000, on the file of Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No.I), Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Thankaswamy
Operative part
O R D E R When the matter was listed for hearing on 12.02.2019, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 07.03.2019. Today also there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Review Application for non prosecution. Accordingly, the Review Application is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. Assistant Registrar(CS IV) Sd/- //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Rj To The Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court No.1), Chennai. rv[co] srg 03/04/2019 Review Application No.62 of 2012 Against A.S.No.759 of 2008
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Review Application is dismissed for non-
Which court decided this case, and when?
Madras High Court, on 07 Mar 2019. The bench was M DURAISWAMY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.