BATTU DEVANANDW.P. No. 30606 of 2016andW.M.P. No. 26535 of 2016 S. Venkatesan v. The Chief Educational Officer
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
W.P. No. 30606 of 2016IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 20.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANANDW.P. No. 30606 of 2016andW.M.P. No. 26535 of 2016S. Venkatesan ... Petitioner Vs.
The Chief Educational Officer, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.
The Joint Director (Personnel), DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.
The Chief Educational Officer, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District.
The Headmaster, Higher Secondary School, Pallikaranai.... RespondentsWrit petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the second respondent herein in Na.Ka.No.6060/A3/2016, dated 28.08.2016 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms. S. SuneethaFor Respondents: Mrs. P. Raja Rejeswari, Government Advocate1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No. 30606 of 2016
Operative part
O R D E RLearned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this writ petition, nothing survives in this writ petition and sought to dismiss the writ petition as infructuous. 2. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.20.06.2025Index :Yes/NoNeutral Citation :Yes/NoATTo1.The Chief Educational Officer, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.2.The Joint Director (Personnel), DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.3.The Chief Educational Officer, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District. 4. The Headmaster, Higher Secondary School, Pallikaranai.2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No. 30606 of 2016BATTU DEVANAND, J.ATW.P. No. 30606 of 2016 andW.M.P. No. 26535 of 201620.06.20253/3
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.