✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

ANITA SUMANTH

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

W.P.No.30003 of 2002IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.08.2024CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHandTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGANW.P.No.30003 of 2002M/s.T.Thangavel Chettiyar,T.Muthusamy ChettiyarBhavani RoadPerundurai... Petitionervs1.The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (CTSMR) Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Chepauk Chennai 600 005.

2.

The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT) Erode.

3.

The Commercial Taxes Officer Perundurai, Erode District. .. RespondentsPrayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent in reference No.N1/72352/96 in SMR Number 80/97 and quash the impugned order dated 20.02.2002 and further restore the order of the second respondent in A.P.54/96 dt 31.07.1996.1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30003 of 2002 For Petitioner: Mr.C.Subramanianfor M/s.Chandran Karuppiah & RamaniFor Respondents: Mr.C.Harsha RajAdditional Government PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J)Both Mr.C.Subramanian, learned counsel appearing for M/s.Chandran Karuppiah & Ramani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.C.Harsha Raj, learned Additional Government Pleader for the Commercial Taxes Department would accede to the position that the present writ petition is infructuous as the petitioner/assessee has settled the demand by way of an application made before the authorities under the Samadhan scheme and Form-V that deals with the certificate of settlement has been issued on 11.12.2023.2. In view of the same, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. [A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] 22.08.2024Index: Yes/NoSpeaking OrderNeutral Citation: Yesmpl2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30003 of 2002To1.The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (CTSMR) Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Chepauk Chennai 600 005.2.The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT) Erode. 3. The Commercial Taxes Officer Perundurai Erode District.3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30003 of 2002DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN.,JmplW.P.No.30003 of 200222.08.20244/4

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments