✦ Madras High Court

Akash @ Manivasagam v. State

T V THAMILSELVI3 min read

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties ( one must be a blood surety), each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the…

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 16.04.2024CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVICrl.O.P.No.9231 of 2024 Akash @ Manivasagam... PetitionerVs.State Rep by. The Station House Officer, Ariyankuppam Police Station, Puducherry District. Crime No. 38 of 2024... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in crime No.38 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.YuvarajFor Respondent : Mr.K.S.Mohandass Public Prosecutor(Pondicherry)1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

O R D E R The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.03.2024 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 20 (b) (ii) (A) r/w 8 ( c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 and Section 77 of the Juvenile (Justice (Care and Protection of children) Act 2015 in crime No. 38 of 2024 on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that the respondent police found the petitioner and other accused persons with the possession of 55 grams of Ganja nearby school premises. Hence, the case.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. On the other side, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submits that respondent police found the petitioner and other accused persons with the possession of 55 grams of Ganja and they used to sell the ganja to the school boys. Further, he stated that co-accused have been released on bail. Hence, he raised strong objection to grant bail to the petitioner.2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4.

Considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner and also co-accused have have been released on bail. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

5.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties ( one must be a blood surety), each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Puducherry, and on further conditions that:[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two months. Further, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand Only) to 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis the credit of Registered Advocate clerks Welfare Association, Puducherry, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the learned Judicial Magistrate, after perusing the challan/ receipt, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner;[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.16.04.2024pbl4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.pblTo1. The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Puducherry.2. The Station House Officer, Ariyankuppam Police Station, Puducherry District.3. The Central Prison, Kalapet, Puducherry. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Crl.O.P.No.9231 of 202416.04.20245/5

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments