✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Provisions considered

Judgment

WP No. 11558 of 2026__________Page1 of 3IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSEWP No. 11558 of 2026A.AmuthaW/o.Amurthalingam, kedilam, senjikuppam, Thirunavallur Post, ulunthurpet circle, kallakurichi - 607 204...Petitioner(s)Vs1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Kallakurichi.2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Tirukkoyilur, Kallakurichi.3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Ulunthurpet, Kallakurichi...Respondent(s)Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider my representations dated 29.01.2026 and issue the patta to the petitioner in the survey No.9/1 extent for extent of 0.29 acres within the time fixed by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner(s):Mr.B.Abdul SamathUdaiyar Balmurgan KF.W.H.PithasanS.VigneshFor Respondent(s):Mr.D.RavichanderSpecial Government Pleader https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11558 of 2026__________Page2 of 3ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. 2.In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 02-04-2026Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/NoRKA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 11558 of 2026__________Page3 of 3ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.RKATo1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Kallakurichi.2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Tirukkoyilur, Kallakurichi.3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Ulunthurpet, Kallakurichi.WP No. 11558 of 202602-04-2026

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments