Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Operative part
W.P.No.11163 of 2021IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 14.08.2024CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYW.P. No.11163 of 2021 and W.M.P. No.11798 of 2021 Titanium Equipment and Anode Mfg. Co. Ltd.represented by R. SubhachandraTEAM HouseGST SalaiVandalurChennai, Tamil Nadu 600 048Petitioner vs. The Commissioner of Customs (Imports)Government of IndiaMinistry of FinanceOffice of the Commissioner of Customs, ImportsCustoms House60 Rajaji SalaiChennai 600 001RespondentWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records comprised in Order in Original No.79111/2021 dated 22.01.2021 on the file of the respondent and quash the Order in Original No.79111/2021 and direct the respondent to pass fresh orders after providing a reasonable opportunity. For petitioner Mr. E. RameshFor respondentMr. G. ShanmugamJunior Standing Counsel1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.11163 of 2021KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.gyaO R D E RThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement in the writ petition to that effect. 2. In view of the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected W.M.P. stands closed.14.08.2024gyaIndex : Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes/NoToThe Commissioner of Customs (Imports)Government of IndiaMinistry of FinanceOffice of the Commissioner of Customs, ImportsCustoms House60 Rajaji SalaiChennai 600 001W.P.No.11163 of 20212/2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.