✦ High Court of India · 18 Mar 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 18 Mar 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
18 Mar 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,141 words

WP No. 9382 of 2025 etc., IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-03-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIWP Nos. 9382, 9386, 9387, 9388, 9389 and 9396 OF 2025W.P.No.9382 of 20251. MANIKANDANS/o Sellamuthu, No 14, Perumal Koil Street, Emaper Post, Kallakkurichi 606 202Petitioner(s)Vs1. The Deputy Commissioner Of Labour (conciliation)-IIrungattukottai, Sriperumputhur.2.The ManagementSathyabama University, Rajivganthi Road (omr), Jeppiar Nagar, Semmanchery, Chennai 600 119Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9382 of 2025 etc., WP No. 9396 of 20251. P.KarunakaranS/o Perumal No 85, Perumal Koil Street, Kavanipakkam Village, Porpanthar Post, Kanchipuram DistrictPetitioner(s)Vs1. The Deputy Commissioner Of Labour (conciliation)-IIrungattukottai, Sriperumputhur.2.The ManagementSathyabama University, Rajivganthi Road (omr), Jeppiar Nagar, Semmanchery, Chennai 600 119Respondent(s)WP No. 9389 of 20251. A.BaraniS/o Angappan No 259, River Street, Kattamuthupalayam Post, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore DistrictPetitioner(s)Vs1. The Deputy Commissioner Of Labour (conciliation)-IIrungattukottai, Sriperumputhur.2.The ManagementSathyabama University, Rajivganthi Road (omr), Jeppiar Nagar, Semmanchery, Chennai 600 119 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9382 of 2025 etc., Respondent(s)WP No. 9388 of 20251. R.Gnanaprakasam,S/o Rajagopal, No 162, Gangai Amman Koil Street, Periyanatham Village, Melperanallur Post, Kanchipuram DistrictPetitioner(s)Vs1. The Deputy Commissioner Of Labour (conciliation)-IIrungattukottai, Sriperumputhur.2.The ManagementSathyabama University, Rajivganthi Road (omr), Jeppiar Nagar, Semmanchery, Chennai 600 119Respondent(s)WP No. 9387 of 20251. P.LoganathanS/o Parthasarathi, Mettu Street, Sevur Post, Arani Taluk, Tiruvannamalai DistrictPetitioner(s)Vs1. The Deputy Commissioner Of Labour (conciliation)-IIrungattukottai, Sriperumputhur.2.The Management https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9382 of 2025 etc., Sathyabama University, Rajivganthi Road (omr), Jeppiar Nagar, Semmanchery, Chennai 600 119Respondent(s)WP No. 9386 of 20251. P. AyyamuthaliS/o Periyathambi No 524, Erikkarai, Ganthi Nagar, Solinganallur, Chennai 600 119Petitioner(s)Vs1. The Deputy Commissioner Of Labour (conciliation)-IIrungattukottai, Sriperumputhur.2.The ManagementSathyabama University, Rajivganthi Road (omr), Jeppiar Nagar, Semmanchery, Chennai 600 119Respondent(s)WP No. 9382 of 2025PRAYERCall for the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent authority in Na.Ka. No 89/ 2024 dated 26.04.2024 by declining to refer the industrial dispute raised by the petitioner under section 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and consequently direct the 1st respondent authority to issue failure report under section 12 (4) of Industrial Disputes Act. WP No. 9396 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9382 of 2025 etc., PRAYERCall for the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent authority in Na.Ka. No 90/ 2024 dated 26.04.2024 by declining to refer the industrial dispute raised by the petitioner under section 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and consequently direct the 1st respondent authority to issue failure report under section 12 (4) of Industrial Disputes Act and to passWP No. 9389 of 2025PRAYERCall for the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent authority in Na.Ka. No 94/ 2024 dated 26.04.2024 by declining to refer the industrial dispute raised by the petitioner under section 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and consequently direct the 1st respondent authority to issue failure report under section 12 (4) of Industrial Disputes Act. WP No. 9388 of 2025PRAYERCall for the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent authority in Na.Ka. No 91/ 2024 dated 26.04.2024 by declining to refer the industrial dispute raised by the petitioner under section 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and consequently direct the 1st respondent authority to issue failure report under section 12 (4) of Industrial Disputes Act. WP No. 9387 of 2025PRAYERCall for the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent authority in Na.Ka. No 92/ 2024 dated 26.04.2024 by declining to refer the industrial dispute raised by the petitioner under section 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and consequently direct the 1st respondent authority to issue failure report under section 12 (4) of Industrial Disputes Act. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9382 of 2025 etc., WP No. 9386 of 2025PRAYERCall for the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent authority in Na.Ka. No 93/ 2024 dated 26.04.2024 by declining to refer the industrial dispute raised by the petitioner under section 2(A) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and consequently direct the 1st respondent authority to issue failure report under section 12 (4) of Industrial Disputes Act. In all Writ PetitionsFor Petitioner(s):S.ParthasarathiFor Respondent(s):Mr. K. Surendren, Additional Government Pleader For R1 R2 - NdwCOMMON ORDER These Writ Petitions have been filed challenging the communications dated 26.04.2024 issued by the first respondent/Deputy Commissioner of Labour to the petitioners.2. The petitioners who have joined on various dates and various post challenged the deputation order issued by the second respondent Management through their trade union and raised Industrial Disputes in this regard. Since the deputation order passed by the second respondent Management was only for the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9382 of 2025 etc., limited period, the petitioners have approached the second respondent Management to provide employment but the same was orally denied by the Management. It is pertinent to note that none of the employees joined in the deputation station instead they have challenged the same by way of Industrial Disputes. The petitioners have raised Industrial Disputes challenging non-employment and has approached the first respondent/Deputy Commissioner of Labour. The first respondent, by impugned communication dated 26.04.2024, closed the petitions stating that the Industrial Dispute under Section 2A(1) does not arise as the same can be invoked when the employer discharges, dismisses, retrenches, or otherwise terminates the services of an individual workman. Moreover, the first respondent has also stated that the workmen has suppressed the factor of the pending proceedings before the Labour Court filed on behalf of the Trade Union and that the factor that the deputed employees did not join the place of the deputation. Without waiting for the result of the Industrial Disputes, the workmen has approached the first respondent and citing the above reason, the first respondent closed the petitions submitted on behalf of the deputed workmen. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9382 of 2025 etc., 3. Though very many grounds have been raised on behalf of the petitioners, when these matters are taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that this Court, without going into the merits of the case, may direct the Labour Court, Kanchipuram to dispose of I.D.Nos.145 of 2019 and 17 of 2020 within a reasonable time fixed by this Court. 4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent.5. Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this Court, without interfering with the impugned communication dated 26.04.2024 issued by the first respondent, directs the Labour Court, Kanchipuram, to dispose of I.D.Nos.145 of 2019 and 17 of 2020 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9382 of 2025 etc., 6. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 18-03-2025Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/NossbTo1.The Deputy Commissioner Of Labour (conciliation)-IIrungattukottai, Sriperumputhur.2.The ManagementSathyabama University, Rajivganthi Road (omr), Jeppiar Nagar, Semmanchery, Chennai 600 119 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9382 of 2025 etc., M.DHANDAPANI J. ssbWP No. 9382 of 2025AND WP NO. 9396 OF 2025,WP NO. 9389 OF 2025,WP NO. 9388 OF 2025,WP NO. 9387 OF 2025,WP NO. 9386 OF 202518-03-2025

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments