Karkineelsa v. //P.Magendran
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
2counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 11.04.2018CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHACrl.O.P.No.2777 of 2011andCrl.M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 Karkineelsa... Petitioner/Accused//vs//P.Magendran... Respondent/ComplainantPrayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. To call for the records and quash the complaint in C.C.No.265 of 2010 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-I, Udumalpet. For Petitioner : Mr.S.ShankarFor Respondent : No appearanceORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned http://www.judis.nic.in 2counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 11.04.2018Index : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/No mst R. HEMALATHA, J., http://www.judis.nic.in 3mst CrL.O.P.No.2777 of 2011 11.04.2018
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 2counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.