M/s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
W.P.No.7520 of 2024THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.11.2024CORAM :The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHYW.P.No.7520 of 2024and WMP No.8431 of 2024M/s Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Represented by N.Vinod, Assistant General Manager(Admn/Legal), O/o General Manager, Sreerangapalayam, Salem-636 007... Petitioner -vs-The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Salem Steel Plant Road, Dalavaipatti, Salem -636 302... Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent not to initiate or proceed with any coercive action in culmination of the order passed under Sec.7A and para 26-B of the EPF & MP Act, 1952, dated 29.11.2023, till passing of any orders by listing the Appeal filed in SR No.71/2024, before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal.
For Petitioner: Mr.S.GopinathanPage 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7520 of 2024 For Respondent: Mr.P.K.PanneerselvamStanding Counsel * * * * *ORDERThis writ petition is filed challenging the order passed under Section 7A of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 dated 29.11.2023. As against the said order passed under Section 7A, the petitioner has a remedy of appeal under Section 7(i) of the Act before the appropriate forum. 2. At the time of entertaining the writ petition, there was no Presiding Officer in the appellate forum and as such, the writ petition was entertained. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for both sides would submit that the memorandum of appeal filed by the petitioner is also taken on file in E.P.F.A.No. 71 of 2024 and the same is pending. The conditional order of stay granted by this Court is also complied with.
Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7520 of 20243. Recording the submission of the learned counsel, this writ petition is closed, with a further direction for the parties to agitate their rights before the pending appeal. The appellate authority shall consider the appeal on merits and in accordance with law and pass orders thereon. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.29.11.2024Index: NoNC: NoSpeakingsraTo The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Salem Steel Plant Road, Dalavaipatti, Salem -636 302. Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7520 of 2024D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.(sra)W.P.No.7520 of 202429.11.2024Page 4 of 4
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.