Arulmighu Macheswarar Devasthanam v. E.Thanmin Maraikayar2.Varadhan @ Kutti
Case at a glance
- Bench
- V LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Outcome
Withdrawn
Permission is granted and the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Permission is granted and the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 23.06.2025Index: Yes / No Speaking Order :Yes / NoNeutral Citation: Yes / NossbTo1.The learned Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kanchipuram. 2. The learned Rent Controller…
Judgment
C.R.P.No.2019 of 2016IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANANC.R.P.No.2019 of 2016 Arulmighu Macheswarar Devasthanam, Represented by its Managing Trustee,P.Radhakrishnan,S/o.Desavelu Mudaliar,15/C, East Raja Street, Kanchipuram ...Petitioner Vs.
E.Thanmin Maraikayar2.Varadhan @ Kutti ... RespondentsPRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act, 1960, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 31.03.2016 passed in R.C.A.No.16 of 2012 on the file of the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority at Kanchipuram, confirming that of the learned Rent Controller, Kanchipuram dated 14.09.2010 made in R.C.O.P.No.7 of 2004. For Petitioner :Mr.A.Kripakaran1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.2019 of 2016 For Respondents:R1-DiedR2-Died
O R D E RMr.A.Kripakaran, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition.
Operative part
Permission is granted and the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 23.06.2025Index: Yes / No Speaking Order :Yes / NoNeutral Citation: Yes / NossbTo1.The learned Rent Control Appellate Authority, Kanchipuram. 2. The learned Rent Controller, Kanchipuram.2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.No.2019 of 2016V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.ssbC.R.P.No.2019 of 2016 01.08.2025 3/3
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Permission is granted and the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Tamil Nadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act, 1960 — s. 25.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.