✦ High Court of India · 05 Jan 2026

High Court · 2026

Case Details High Court of India · 05 Jan 2026
Court
High Court of India
Decided
05 Jan 2026
Length
1,182 words

CMA.No.1101 of 2025CMA.No.1101 of 2025and CMP.No.9168 of 2025T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.Today, the matter is listed under the caption “for being mentioned“ at the instance of the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 4.2. The learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 4 submitted that in the order dated 12.08.2025 in CMA.No.1101 of 2025, in operative portion at paragraph 6, the third respondent was wrongly shown as “minor”. Hence, the operative portion of the order may be corrected accordingly.3. In view of the above submission, the Registry is directed to substitute paragraph 6 in the order dated 12.08.2025 with the following text:“6. After deducting 10% towards contributory negligence the claimants are entitled to Rs.36,41,040/-. In view of the discussions made earlier, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is reduced to Rs. 36,41,040/-. The appellant is directed to deposit the said amount together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of claim petition till the date of realisation, to the credit of MCOP.No.9/2018, on the file of the MACT, Sub Court, Pollachi, within a period eight weeks from the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.No.1101 of 2025date of receipt of a copy of this judgement. The first respondent is entitled to Rs.11,00,000/-, second and third respondents are entitled to Rs.9,00,000/- each, and fourth respondent is entitled to Rs.7,41,040/-. Share of the Second respondent (minor) shall be deposited in a Nationalized bank till he attains majority and the natural guardian of the minor is permitted to withdraw the interest amount. On such deposit, the other claimants are permitted to withdraw the award amount by making formal application before the Tribunal. The appellant may deduct the amount, if any already deposited before the tribunal. In so far as the enhanced compensation is concerned, the deficit court fee, if not paid, shall be paid by the claimant(s).”4. In all other respects, the order dated 12.08.2025, shall remain unaltered. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary correction and issue a fresh order copy to the parties forthwith.05-01-2026pvsIndex:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.No.1101 of 2025T.V.THAMILSELVI J.pvsCMA.No.1101 of 2025 05-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.No.1101 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 12-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVICMA No. 1101 of 2025ANDCMP NO. 9168 OF 20251. M/s.National Insurance Company LimitedRep. by its Manager, R.P.Towers, Second Floor, Coimbatore Road, Pollachi.Appellant(s)Vs1. MayadeviW/o.Late Sathish, Residing at No.8/13 Govt.School Street, Anaimalai, Pollachi Tk.,2.Minor PraneshS/o.Late Sathish, Rep. by his mother Mayadevi as next friend and natural Guardian, No. 8/13, Government school street, Anaimalai, Pollachi Taluk3.ManoharS/o.Parthasarathy, No. 8/13, Government school street, Anaimalai, Pollachi Taluk4.SanthiW/o.Manohar, No. 8/13, Government school street, Anaimalai, Pollachi Taluk5.R VadivelS/o.Rasu, No.32, Old Police Station road, Dharapuram6.Wassya Inter Trade Private Limited https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.No.1101 of 2025Old No.59/1, New No. 59/B, Vakkampalayam Village, Pollachi Taluk.Respondent(s)PRAYERTo set-aside the decree and judgement passed in MCOP.No.9/2018, dated 06-09-2024, on the file of the MACT, Sub Court, Pollachi.CMA No. 1101 of 2025For Appellant(s):Mrs.N.B.SurekhaFor Respondent(s):MR. Ma.P.Thangavel FOR R1 to R4 JUDGEMENTThis Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed to set-aside the decree and judgement passed in MCOP.No.9/2018, dated 06-09-2024, on the file of the MACT, Sub Court, Pollachi.2. On 17.06.2017 at about 05.30 p.m when the deceased Satheesh was riding Honda Unicorn Motorcycle bearing registration No. TN 41 AC 5717 toward East to West in Pollachi to Meenkarai Road, near Nanjaegounderpudur Bus Stop, at that time, the first respondent drove the Eicher Van bearing registration No. TN 41 AH 6435 in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against Satheesh due to which he sustained grevious injuries all over the body and died. Thereafter, the claimants filed the appeal before the tribunal claiming compensation and the respondents contested the case by filing counter. After https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.No.1101 of 2025considering the oral and documentary evidence the tribunal awarded compensation. Challenging the award passed by the tribunal the Insurance company filed this appeal.3. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that at time of the accident the deceased has not wore the helmet due to which he sustained head injuries and died. But the tribunal has failed to fix contributory negligence upon the deceased. Further, he pointed out that as per the income certificate/Ex.P5 the deceased has received Rs.18,331/- with allowance after deduction it comes around Rs.16,470/-. Hence he prays to modify the income fixed by the tribunal and set aside the award passed by the tribunal.4. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that tribunal has rightly fixed compensation which needs no interference.4. On perusal of the records, it reveal that before the Trial Court there is no contra evidence produced on the side of the appellant to prove that the deceased not wear the helmet at the time of the accident. However the nature of head injury sustained by the deceased shows that the deceased not wear helmet. Hence, this Court is inclined to fix 10% contributory negligence upon the deceased.5. In respect of fixation of notional income, the deceased has received Rs.18,331/- from the employer, who was examined as witness however the Tribunal fixed only Rs.18,000/- as income of the deceased as such needs no interference. Further, while fixing compensation the tribunal has taken 50% as https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.No.1101 of 2025future prospectus which is excessive. Hence, this Court is inclined to reduce the future future prospectus from 50% to 40%. Accordingly, the claimant is entitled to Rs. 38,55,600/- under the head of loss of dependency. Further, the tribunal has awarded very less amount under the head of loss of love and affection. Hence, this Court is inclined to fix Rs.1,20,000/- under the head of love and affection. S.No.HeadsCompensation awarded by the tribunal.Compensation awarded by this Court1.Loss of dependencyRs. 41,51,000/-Rs.38,55,600/-2.Loss of estateRs.15,000/-Rs.15,000/-3.Loss of consortiumRs.40,000/-Rs.40,000/-4.Funeral expensesRs.15,000/-Rs.15,000/-5.Loss of love and affectionRs.45,000/-Rs.1,20,000/-TotalRs.42,51,000/-Rs. 40,45,600/-6. After deducting 10% towards contributory negligence the claimants are entitled to Rs. 36,41,040/-. In view of the discussions made earlier, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is reduced to Rs. 36,41,040/-. The appellant is directed to deposit the said amount together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of claim petition to the date of realisation, to the credit of MCOP.No.9/2018, on the file of the MACT, Sub Court, Pollachi, within a period eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgement. The first respondent is entitled to Rs.11,00,000/-. Second and third minor respondents are entitled to Rs. 9,00,000/- each and their share shall be deposited in the Nationalized bank till they attaining their majority and the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.No.1101 of 2025minors are permitted to withdraw the interest amount and fourth respondent is entitled to Rs. 7,41,040/-.On such deposit, the claimants are permitted to withdraw the award amount by making formal application before the Tribunal. The respondent may deduct the amount, if any amount has already deposited before the tribunal. In so far as the enhanced compensation is concerned, the deficit court fee, if not paid, shall be paid by the claimant(s).7. With the above direction, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed. No costs. 12-08-2025pblIndex:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/NoTo1. The MACT, Sub Court, Pollachi.2. The Section officer, V. R Section High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.No.1101 of 2025T.V.THAMILSELVI J. pblCMA No. 1101 of 2025AND CMP NO. 9168 OF 202512-08-2025

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments