Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Balaji, Proprietor of J.B and J.S.Aqua Thaniachalam Amman Road, (back Side to Kesavaraman Doctor Office) L.I.C. Building, Tiruttani, Thiruvallur District. Respondent(s)PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to…
Judgment
WP No. 7714 of 2022IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYWP No. 7714 of 2022ANDWMP NO. 7730 OF 2022R.Rama Kumari,W/o.Ravikumar, NO.267, Chittoor Road, Tiruttani, Thiruvallur District. Petitioner(s)Vs1.The State by The Revenue Divisional Officer, The R.D.O. Office, Tiruttani, Thiruvallur District.
The TasildharThe Taluk office, Tiruttani, Thiruvallur District.
Operative part
Balaji, Proprietor of J.B and J.S.Aqua Thaniachalam Amman Road, (back Side to Kesavaraman Doctor Office) L.I.C. Building, Tiruttani, Thiruvallur District. Respondent(s)PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to take action against the 3rd respondent for selling unpurified water illegally in the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7714 of 2022name of J.P. Aqua and J.S. Aqua or in any other name at Tiruttani, Tiruvallur District. For Petitioner(s):Mr.C.ChokkalingamFor Respondent(s):Mr.P.AnandakumarGovernment AdvocateNo appearance for R3ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.03-03-2026rstIndex: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet: YesNeutral Citation: Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7714 of 2022To1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, The R.D.O. Office, Tiruttani, Thiruvallur District. 2. The TasildharThe Taluk office, Tiruttani, Thiruvallur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 7714 of 2022KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.rstWP No. 7714 of 2022AND WMP NO. 7730 OF 202203-03-2026
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.