Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Recording the same, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22.M/s.N.M.R. AlloysRep by R.Suseela No. 996/997, 3rd Floor, Gnanalakshmi Complex, Mettupalayam Road, R.S.Puram Coimbatore 641 002.. RespondentsPRAYER: Appeal Suit is filed under Section 13 of the Commercial Court Act, 2015 and Section 96 and Order XLIII Rule 1 of C.P.C, to set aside the Judgment…
Judgment
Appeal (CAD) No.5 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRANandTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMANAppeal (CAD) No.5 of 20251.R.Suseela 2. Nikitha3.Minor Manya .. Appellants Vs.
M/s.A.B.Industries Rep. by its Proprietor, A. Shanthi, W/o. V. Alagirisamy, No.733/3, Thottipalayam Road, Civil Aerodrome Post, Coimbatore.
Operative part
M/s.N.M.R. AlloysRep by R.Suseela No. 996/997, 3rd Floor, Gnanalakshmi Complex, Mettupalayam Road, R.S.Puram Coimbatore 641 002.. RespondentsPRAYER: Appeal Suit is filed under Section 13 of the Commercial Court Act, 2015 and Section 96 and Order XLIII Rule 1 of C.P.C, to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 02.01.2024 passed by the Learned 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Appeal (CAD) No.5 of 2025 Commercial Court (District Judge Cadre), Coimbatore in C.O.S.No.72 of 2023. For Appellants : Mr.L.Mouli For R1 : Mr.S.ArjunFor R2 : Not ready noticeJUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants report that the appellants seek to withdraw the appeal and has also filed a memo to that effect, stating that the matter has been settled out of Court.2. Recording the same, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. The appellants shall be entitled to refund of court fee, if eligible under law. [Dr.G.J., J.] & [M.J.R., J.] 19.09.2025 Index : Yes/NoInternet : Yes/Norpl2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Appeal (CAD) No.5 of 2025ToThe Commercial Court (District Judge Cadre), Coimbatore. Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN., J.and3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Appeal (CAD) No.5 of 2025M.JOTHIRAMAN ., J. Appeal (CAD) No.5 of 202519.09.20254/4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 96.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.