✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

3 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

With the above terms, this application stands disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 88. With the above terms, this application stands disposed of.17.06.2026Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/NoMaya__________Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 476 of 2026K.KUMARESH BABU, J.MayaArb Appln No. 476 of 2026 Dated : 17.06.2026__________Page5 of 5

Judgment

Arb Appln No. 476 of 2026IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 17.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABUArb Appln No. 476 of 2026M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited, Chola Crest, C54-55 & Super B – 4,Thiru-vi-ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032,Represented by its Authorised Signatory...Petitioner(s)VsMs. Durga G.D/o. Ghan Shyam Yadav, Village Loharruli Post Bhagausa, LohrauliSant Kabir Nagar, BhagausaUttar Pradesh – 272126. ..Respondent(s)Prayer Arbitration Application under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Section 9(1)(ii)(a)(b)(d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to appoint employee of the Applicant viz., Mr.Ashish Saxena, Area Receivables Manager, as Receiver to seize and take possession of the vehicle which is more fully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondent’s men, agents, servants from respondent premises or wherever found with Police aid and break open of premises if necessary. For Petitioner(s):Mr.D.Pradeep KumarFor Respondent(s):No appearance__________Page1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 476 of 2026

O R D E RThis application has been filed to appoint employee of the Applicant viz., Mr.Ashish Saxena, Area Receivables Manager, as Receiver to seize and take possession of the vehicle which is more fully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondent’s men agents, servants from respondent premises or wherever found with Police aid and break open of premises if necessary.

2.

The learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the applicant had provided a loan to the respondent for the purchase of the vehicle Maruti XL6 Zeta MT, bearing Engine No.K15BN9223717, Chassis No.MA3CNC32SMM280205 and Registration No.UP32MP2591 and also a Loan Agreement had also been entered by the respondent with the applicant on 23.12.2021. He would contend that there is some unremained installments that are to be made by the respondent and that in spite of repeated demands, the respondent had failed to regularize the default and had continued to not pay the EMIs. He would further submit that considering the facts of the case, the applicant had sought for an appointment of a party receiver which would be more effective.

3.

In spite of notice having been effected on the respondent, the respondent had neither chosen to appear before this Court in person nor is being __________Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 476 of 2026represented by a counsel. The name of the respondent has been reflected in the cause-list. He was called absent and set ex parte.

4.

I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and also perused the materials placed on record.

5.

This Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a prima facie case for appointment of a Party Receiver and also finds that the award had been passed on 03.03.2024.

6.

Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, this Court is satisfied with the prayer sought for in this application and in fine, Mr.Ashish Saxena, Area Receivables Manager, as Party Receiver to seize and take possession of the asset Maruti XL6 Zeta MT, bearing Engine No.K15BN9223717, Chassis No.MA3CNC32SMM280205 and Registration No.UP32MP2591 from the respondent or any place belonging to the respondent or wherever found and with whomsoever it is found. It is also made clear that if police help is required, the Party Receiver shall make a request to the local police station within whose jurisdiction the vehicle is found and on such request being made, the Station House Officer shall send the Police Personnel along with the Party Receiver to seize the vehicle. If break open of a lock is required, __________Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 476 of 2026the Party Receiver shall do so in the presence of the police personnel who will counter sign the record evidencing the break open of the lock and to re-lock the premises. If the Party Receiver finds any difficulty with the jurisdictional police, he is at liberty to approach Superintendent of Police, who shall provide all necessary assistance to him at the time of seizure of the vehicle.

7.

If the respondent make good the unpaid installments or makes substantial payments of the dues to be paid to the satisfaction of the applicant, the applicant shall return the asset in the condition it was re-possessed.

Operative part

8.

With the above terms, this application stands disposed of.17.06.2026Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/NoMaya__________Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb Appln No. 476 of 2026K.KUMARESH BABU, J.MayaArb Appln No. 476 of 2026 Dated : 17.06.2026__________Page5 of 5

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above terms, this application stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments