Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANDG ARUL MURUGAN, CHIEF ANDG ARUL MURUGAN
Outcome
Withdrawn
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Operative part
W.P.No.12577 of 2026IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.06.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANW.P.No.12577 of 2026R.JayarajS/o. Ramasamy, No.5A, 14th East Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Vellore 632 006PetitionerVs1.Indian Bank Rep. by its Branch Manager, Main Branch, Katpadi Road, Vellore 632 0062.The Recovery Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal II, Chennai 600 0063.The Chief Manager Indian Bank, Main Branch, Vellore 632 006Respondents______________Page 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12577 of 2026PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to Recovery Certificate dated 01.06.2023 in TA No.203/2018 (renumbered as TRC No.924/2023 ) and quash the same. For Petitioner: Mr. S.Sri KarthikORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 03.06.2026 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/Nobbr______________Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12577 of 2026To:
The Branch Manager, Indian Bank Main Branch, Katpadi Road, Vellore 632 0062.The Recovery Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal II, Chennai 600 0063.The Chief Manager Indian Bank, Main Branch, Vellore 632 006______________Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12577 of 2026THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN, J. bbrW.P.No.12577 of 2026 03.06.2026______________Page 4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.