R.Meenambigai v. Sivanantham
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With these directions, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
CRP No. 1911 of 2026__________Page1 of 4IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSECRP No. 1911 of 2026R.Meenambigai..Petitioner(s)VsSivanantham..Respondent(s)Prayer:- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the order and decree dated 06.02.2026 passed in MP Sr.No. 4019 of 2026 in RLTOP No. 621 of 2025 dated 06.02.2026 on the file of the X Judge (FAC) Court of Small Causes Chennai and consequently direct the rent court to reject of RLTOP No. 621 of 2025 filed by the landlord. For Petitioner(s):Mr.S.SenthilvelFor Respondent(s):Mr.R.AmizhdhuORDERThis Civil Revision Petition (CRP) has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 06.02.2026 passed in MP Sr.No. 4019 of 2026 in RLTOP No. 621 of 2025 on the file of X Judge (FAC), Court of Small Causes, Chennai.2. Under the impugned order, the preliminary objection raised by the petitioner with regard to maintainability of RLTOP No. 621 of 2025 has been https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 1911 of 2026__________Page2 of 4rejected by directing the petitioner to raise all those objections in the main RLTOP. Instead of proceeding with the main RLTOP, the petitioner has filed this CRP challenging the impugned order. Necessarily, the trial Court will have to consider all the objections that have been raised by the petitioner which includes the maintainability of RLTOP No. 621 of 2025 by relying upon Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017, while deciding the main RLTOP No.621 of 2025.3. Without interfering with the impugned order, as the impugned order has not gone into the merits of the contentions as raised in this CRP, this Court directs the trial Court, namely, X Judge (FAC), Court of Small Causes, Chennai, to consider all the objections that have been raised in the counter statement filed by the petitioner in the main RLTOP No. 621 of 2025, and pass a speaking order with regard to her objections in the final decision to be rendered by the trial Court in RLTOP No. 621 of 2025. The Trial Court is directed to dispose of the said RLTOP as expeditiously as possible. With these directions, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No Costs. C.M.P.No.8588 of 2026 is closed.,03-06-2026Neutral Citation: Yes/NoRKM https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 1911 of 2026__________Page3 of 4ToX Judge (FAC),Court of Small Causes, Chennai, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 1911 of 2026__________Page4 of 4ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.RKMCRP No. 1911 of 202603-06-2026
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With these directions, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.