High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
W.P.No.5813 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 09.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANW.P.No.5813 of 2024&W.M.P.Nos.6449, 6451 & 6453 of 2024S.T.Sivagnanan..PetitionerVs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government Environment, Climate Change and Forests Department Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai 600 009.2. The District Collector Office of the District Collector 7/1, State Bank Rd Gopalapuram Coimbatore 641 018.3. The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore State Bank Rd, Gopalapuram Coimbatore 641 018.4. The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Rep. by its Chairman No.74, Anna Salai, Guindy Chennai 600 032.____________Page 1 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 20245. The District Environmental Engineer Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Coimbatore South Plot No.E55A, SIDCO Industrial Estate Pollach Main Road, Kuruchi Coimbatore 641 021.6. The District Forest Officer Tamil Nadu Forest Academy Campus Vanaviyal College Coimbatore 641 043.7. Isha Foundation Rep. by its Trustee Velliangiri Foothills Ishana Vihar Post Coimbatore 641 114...RespondentsPrayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 6 to take appropriate action to stop the discharge of sewage and effluents by the 7th respondent into the neighbouring lands of the petitioner in S.No.1080/1 including but not limited to lands comprised in S.Nos.1080/2E, 2F, 2H, 2J and 2K, Ikkarai Booluvampatti Village, Coimbatore South and further direct them not to issue any permission/license to the 7th respondent to conduct any festivals or gathering without making appropriate arrangements for the discharge of sewage and effluents in a proper manner and making proper arrangements to prevent the disturbance to the animals in the nearby Velliangiri forest area.____________Page 2 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 2024For Petitioner :Mrs.Chitra SampathSenior CounselFor Mr.Aravind JFor Respondents :Dr.T.SeenivasanSpl. Govt. Pleader (Forest) for Respondents 1 & 6Mr.K.Karthik JegannathGovernment Advocate for Respondent-2Mr.MuniyapparajAdditional Public Prosecutor for Respondent-3Mr.J.RavindranAdditional Advocate GeneralAssisted byMr.V.GunasekarStanding Counselfor Respondents 4 & 5Mr.Sathish ParasaranSenior CounselFor Mr.K.Gowtham Kumarfor Respondent-7ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)This petition was filed by petitioner seeking a direction to ____________Page 3 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 2024official respondents to take appropriate action to stop the discharge of sewage and effluents by seventh respondent into the neighbouring lands of petitioner in S.No.1080/1, including but not limited to lands comprised in S.Nos.1080/2E, 2F, 2H, 2J and 2K, Ikkarai Booluvampatti Village, Coimbatore South and further direct them not to issue any permission/license to seventh respondent to conduct any festivals or gathering without making appropriate arrangements for the discharge of sewage and effluents in a proper manner and making proper arrangements to prevent the disturbance to the animals in the nearby Velliangiri forest area.2. In this petition, this Court had directed respondent Pollution Control Board to file counter. The contents of the counter affidavit show that certain deficiencies were found, for which, directions were issued to remove those deficiencies.3. While matter stood thus, petitioner filed a fresh petition seeking similar reliefs, which came to be dismissed by order dated 24.02.2025.____________Page 4 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 20244. It appears that petitioner, taking it to be a continuing cause of action of pollution by seventh respondent, filed fresh petition, as new events were being conducted by seventh respondent. Prayer made in the said writ petition was for issuance of a direction to official respondents to initiate appropriate action against 7th respondent for operating its facilities without adequate sewage treatment facilities, for discharging untreated sewage, causing pollution, for causing severe noise pollution in violation of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 and desist from issuing any permission to seventh respondent for conducting various events alleging violation of laws.5. In the aforesaid petition, this Court directed the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board to submit a report with reference to the allegations raised in the petition and a detailed counter affidavit was filed by the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board. This Court perused the report and then proceeded to make the following observations:“6. Perusal of the entire counter affidavit filed by the ____________Page 5 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 2024Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board reveals that adequate facilities are provided in the premises by the 7th respondent to manage the Maha Sivarathri Programme. It is further contended that the ROA of the ANL survey reveals that the ambient noise level was within the standard as prescribed by the Board. The ambient noise level standards considered for the non~planned area is taken into consideration. The noise level at the boundary of the public place, where loudspeaker or public address system or any other noise source is being used shall not exceed 10 dB (A) above the Ambient Noise Standards for the area or 75 dB (A) whichever is lower. The entire averments set out in the counter affidavit reveals that the 7th respondent has submitted adequacy report obtained from Government College of Technology, Coimbatore for all four STPs.7. Pertinently, there is no complaint petition has been received from public regarding air, water and noise pollution. The yoga centre has necessary infrastructure facilities to handle solid, liquid and noise pollution during Maha Sivarathri function. In paragraph No.41 of the counter affidavit, the Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board has stated that the 7th respondent Yoga Centre has adequate facility to handle the liquid and solid waste generated during function. It has also followed Noise Rules. Beyond that, it is stated that ANL survey will be ____________Page 6 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 2024conducted on 26.02.2025 and 27.02.2025 (day and night) during the forthcoming Maha Sivarathri Festival Programme.8. No doubt, the present writ petition has been filed with certain apprehensions that the 7th respondent may cause noise pollution and inadequate facilities are provided in sewage blocks. When the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board filed a counter affidavit stating that the 7th respondent is having adequate facility to handle solid, liquid and noise pollution during Maha Sivarathri Function, there is no reason to consider the apprehensions raised by the petitioner.”6. It is, thus, clear that while the present petition is pending and the issue as to whether seventh respondent was continuing to discharge untreated sewage water into the lands of petitioner is yet to be decided, in the second petition, inspection conducted by the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board and the report submitted before the Court were found satisfactory.7. That eventually led to the dismissal of second writ petition.____________Page 7 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 20248. In view of the dismissal of the subsequent petition, in our view, nothing survives for consideration in the present petition. This petition is, therefore, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim applications are also dismissed.(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 09.09.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/NokplTo1. The Secretary to Government Environment, Climate Change and Forests Department Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai 600 009.2. The District Collector Office of the District Collector 7/1, State Bank Rd____________Page 8 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 2024 Gopalapuram Coimbatore 641 018.3. The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore State Bank Rd, Gopalapuram Coimbatore 641 018.4. The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Rep. by its Chairman No.74, Anna Salai, Guindy Chennai 600 032.5. The District Environmental Engineer Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Coimbatore South Plot No.E55A, SIDCO Industrial Estate Pollach Main Road, Kuruchi Coimbatore 641 021.6. The District Forest Officer Tamil Nadu Forest Academy Campus Vanaviyal College Coimbatore 641 043.____________Page 9 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 2024THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (kpl) W.P.No.5813 of 2024 09.09.2025____________Page 10 of 10
W.P.No.5813 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 09.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANW.P.No.5813 of 2024&W.M.P.Nos.6449, 6451 & 6453 of 2024S.T.Sivagnanan..PetitionerVs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government Environment, Climate Change and Forests Department Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai 600 009.2. The District Collector Office of the District Collector 7/1, State Bank Rd Gopalapuram Coimbatore 641 018.3. The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore State Bank Rd, Gopalapuram Coimbatore 641 018.4. The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Rep. by its Chairman No.74, Anna Salai, Guindy Chennai 600 032.____________Page 1 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 20245. The District Environmental Engineer Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Coimbatore South Plot No.E55A, SIDCO Industrial Estate Pollach Main Road, Kuruchi Coimbatore 641 021.6. The District Forest Officer Tamil Nadu Forest Academy Campus Vanaviyal College Coimbatore 641 043.7. Isha Foundation Rep. by its Trustee Velliangiri Foothills Ishana Vihar Post Coimbatore 641 114...RespondentsPrayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 6 to take appropriate action to stop the discharge of sewage and effluents by the 7th respondent into the neighbouring lands of the petitioner in S.No.1080/1 including but not limited to lands comprised in S.Nos.1080/2E, 2F, 2H, 2J and 2K, Ikkarai Booluvampatti Village, Coimbatore South and further direct them not to issue any permission/license to the 7th respondent to conduct any festivals or gathering without making appropriate arrangements for the discharge of sewage and effluents in a proper manner and making proper arrangements to prevent the disturbance to the animals in the nearby Velliangiri forest area.____________Page 2 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 2024For Petitioner :Mrs.Chitra SampathSenior CounselFor Mr.Aravind JFor Respondents :Dr.T.SeenivasanSpl. Govt. Pleader (Forest) for Respondents 1 & 6Mr.K.Karthik JegannathGovernment Advocate for Respondent-2Mr.MuniyapparajAdditional Public Prosecutor for Respondent-3Mr.J.RavindranAdditional Advocate GeneralAssisted byMr.V.GunasekarStanding Counselfor Respondents 4 & 5Mr.Sathish ParasaranSenior CounselFor Mr.K.Gowtham Kumarfor Respondent-7ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)This petition was filed by petitioner seeking a direction to ____________Page 3 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 2024official respondents to take appropriate action to stop the discharge of sewage and effluents by seventh respondent into the neighbouring lands of petitioner in S.No.1080/1, including but not limited to lands comprised in S.Nos.1080/2E, 2F, 2H, 2J and 2K, Ikkarai Booluvampatti Village, Coimbatore South and further direct them not to issue any permission/license to seventh respondent to conduct any festivals or gathering without making appropriate arrangements for the discharge of sewage and effluents in a proper manner and making proper arrangements to prevent the disturbance to the animals in the nearby Velliangiri forest area.2. In this petition, this Court had directed respondent Pollution Control Board to file counter. The contents of the counter affidavit show that certain deficiencies were found, for which, directions were issued to remove those deficiencies.3. While matter stood thus, petitioner filed a fresh petition seeking similar reliefs, which came to be dismissed by order dated 24.02.2025.____________Page 4 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 20244. It appears that petitioner, taking it to be a continuing cause of action of pollution by seventh respondent, filed fresh petition, as new events were being conducted by seventh respondent. Prayer made in the said writ petition was for issuance of a direction to official respondents to initiate appropriate action against 7th respondent for operating its facilities without adequate sewage treatment facilities, for discharging untreated sewage, causing pollution, for causing severe noise pollution in violation of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 and desist from issuing any permission to seventh respondent for conducting various events alleging violation of laws.5. In the aforesaid petition, this Court directed the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board to submit a report with reference to the allegations raised in the petition and a detailed counter affidavit was filed by the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board. This Court perused the report and then proceeded to make the following observations:“6. Perusal of the entire counter affidavit filed by the ____________Page 5 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 2024Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board reveals that adequate facilities are provided in the premises by the 7th respondent to manage the Maha Sivarathri Programme. It is further contended that the ROA of the ANL survey reveals that the ambient noise level was within the standard as prescribed by the Board. The ambient noise level standards considered for the non~planned area is taken into consideration. The noise level at the boundary of the public place, where loudspeaker or public address system or any other noise source is being used shall not exceed 10 dB (A) above the Ambient Noise Standards for the area or 75 dB (A) whichever is lower. The entire averments set out in the counter affidavit reveals that the 7th respondent has submitted adequacy report obtained from Government College of Technology, Coimbatore for all four STPs.7. Pertinently, there is no complaint petition has been received from public regarding air, water and noise pollution. The yoga centre has necessary infrastructure facilities to handle solid, liquid and noise pollution during Maha Sivarathri function. In paragraph No.41 of the counter affidavit, the Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board has stated that the 7th respondent Yoga Centre has adequate facility to handle the liquid and solid waste generated during function. It has also followed Noise Rules. Beyond that, it is stated that ANL survey will be ____________Page 6 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 2024conducted on 26.02.2025 and 27.02.2025 (day and night) during the forthcoming Maha Sivarathri Festival Programme.8. No doubt, the present writ petition has been filed with certain apprehensions that the 7th respondent may cause noise pollution and inadequate facilities are provided in sewage blocks. When the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board filed a counter affidavit stating that the 7th respondent is having adequate facility to handle solid, liquid and noise pollution during Maha Sivarathri Function, there is no reason to consider the apprehensions raised by the petitioner.”6. It is, thus, clear that while the present petition is pending and the issue as to whether seventh respondent was continuing to discharge untreated sewage water into the lands of petitioner is yet to be decided, in the second petition, inspection conducted by the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board and the report submitted before the Court were found satisfactory.7. That eventually led to the dismissal of second writ petition.____________Page 7 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 20248. In view of the dismissal of the subsequent petition, in our view, nothing survives for consideration in the present petition. This petition is, therefore, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim applications are also dismissed.(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 09.09.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/NokplTo1. The Secretary to Government Environment, Climate Change and Forests Department Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai 600 009.2. The District Collector Office of the District Collector 7/1, State Bank Rd____________Page 8 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 2024 Gopalapuram Coimbatore 641 018.3. The Superintendent of Police, Coimbatore State Bank Rd, Gopalapuram Coimbatore 641 018.4. The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Rep. by its Chairman No.74, Anna Salai, Guindy Chennai 600 032.5. The District Environmental Engineer Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Coimbatore South Plot No.E55A, SIDCO Industrial Estate Pollach Main Road, Kuruchi Coimbatore 641 021.6. The District Forest Officer Tamil Nadu Forest Academy Campus Vanaviyal College Coimbatore 641 043.____________Page 9 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.5813 of 2024THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (kpl) W.P.No.5813 of 2024 09.09.2025____________Page 10 of 10