Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation, dated 27.01.2026, seeking for re-classification of the land morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition as ‘Brindavanam…
Judgment
W.P.No.7285 of 2026IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.03.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSEW.P.No.7285 of 2026 Sri Sri Raghuttama Swami Moola Brindhavana & Shri Uttaradi Math, Rep. by its Manager G.Ragul, VPM Main Road, Manampoondi, Kandachipuram Taluk, Villupuram District – 605 759.... PetitionerVs.
The District Collector, Villupuram District.
The District Revenue Officer, Villupuram District.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Villupuram District.
The Tahsildar, Kandachipuram Taluk, Villupuram District.... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.01.2026, and the report of the 4th respondent in proceedings Na.Ka.No.A4/866/2022 dated Page No.1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7285 of 202619.12.2022, with respect to the land comprised in S.No.25/10, situated at Manampoondi, Kandachipuram Taluk, Villupuram District. For Petitioner: Ms.V.SrimathiFor Respondents: Mr.D.RavichanderSpecial Government Pleader*****ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to change the classification of the land morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition from ‘Nandavanam’ to ‘Brindavanam’.2. The petitioner had filed supporting documents along with their representation, dated 27.01.2026 given to the 2nd respondent for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.3. Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.4. The learned counsel for the petitioner also drew the attention of this Court to the recommendation issued by the 4th respondent through his Page No.2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7285 of 2026proceedings, dated 19.12.2022, recommending the re-classification of the subject land as ‘Brindavanam land’ and also for issuance of patta in the name of the petitioner.
No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner, including the proceedings of the 4th respondent, dated 19.12.2022, recommending the case of the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.
Operative part
For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner’s representation, dated 27.01.2026, seeking for re-classification of the land morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition as ‘Brindavanam land’ instead of ‘Nandavanam land’, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner, which includes the proceedings of the 4th respondent, dated 19.12.2022, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page No.3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7285 of 20267. With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.03.03.2026Index : Yes / NoSpeaking order / Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation Case : Yes/NospPage No.4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7285 of 2026To1.The District Collector, Villupuram District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Villupuram District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Villupuram District. 4. The Tahsildar, Kandachipuram Taluk, Villupuram District. Page No.5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.7285 of 2026ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. spW.P.No.7285 of 202603.03.2026Page No.6 of 6
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.