D.Priya v. The Secretary to the GovernmentHome
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the said submission, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 11.The Secretary to the GovernmentHome, Prohibition and Excise DepartmentFort St. George, SecretariatChennai 600 0092.District Collector & District MagistrateTirupathur DistrictTirupathur3.The Superintendent of Police Tirupathur DistrictTirupathur4.The Superintendent of PrisonCentral PrisonVellore5.The Inspector of PoliceTirupathur Town Police StationTirupathur District ... RespondentsPage 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.413 of 2024PRAYER: Petition…
Judgment
H.C.P.No.413 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.06.2024CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESHandTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANH.C.P.No.413 of 2024D.Priya ... PetitionerVs.
Operative part
The Secretary to the GovernmentHome, Prohibition and Excise DepartmentFort St. George, SecretariatChennai 600 0092.District Collector & District MagistrateTirupathur DistrictTirupathur3.The Superintendent of Police Tirupathur DistrictTirupathur4.The Superintendent of PrisonCentral PrisonVellore5.The Inspector of PoliceTirupathur Town Police StationTirupathur District ... RespondentsPage 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.413 of 2024PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records in connection with the order of Detention passed by the second respondent dated 08.02.2024 in C3/D.O.No.13/2024 against the petitioner's husband Dharuman, Male, aged 34 years, S/o. Sambath, who is confined at Central Prison, Vellore and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner: Mr.D.BalajiFor Respondents: Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor ORDERM.S.RAMESH, J.andSUNDER MOHAN , J. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents, by producing a copy of the Government Order in G.O.Rt.No.1497, Home, Prohibition and Excise (IX) Department, dated 14.03.2024, submitted that the detention order has already been revoked. Page 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.413 of 20242. Recording the said submission, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. [M.S.R., J] [S.M., J] 24.06.2024Index: Yes/NoNeutral CitationkasTo1.The Secretary to the GovernmentHome, Prohibition and Excise DepartmentFort St. George, SecretariatChennai 600 0092.District Collector & District MagistrateTirupathur DistrictTirupathur3.The Superintendent of Police Tirupathur DistrictTirupathur4.The Superintendent of PrisonCentral PrisonVellore5.The Inspector of PoliceTirupathur Town Police StationTirupathur DistrictPage 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.413 of 2024M.S.RAMESH, J.andSUNDER MOHAN, J.kas6.The Public ProsecutorHigh Court of MadrasChennai 600 104H.C.P.No.413 of 202424.06.2024Page 4 of 4
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the said submission, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.