✦ Madras High Court

M/s.Cholamandalam Investment andFinance Company Limited v. Kundan Singh

K KUMARESH BABU

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

Recording the same, this application stands dismissed as withdrawn

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Recording the same, this application stands dismissed as withdrawn.17-06-2026MayaArb. Appln. No. 200 of 2026

Judgment

Arb. Appln. No. 200 of 2026__________Page1 of 2IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 17-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABUArb. Appln. No. 200 of 2026M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited, Chola Crest, C54-55 & Super B – 4,Thiru-vi-ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032,Represented by its Authorised Signatory...ApplicantVs.Kundan Singh, S/o.Mahender Prasad Singh ...RespondentThis application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of OS Rules read with Section 9(1)(ii)(a)(b)(d) and (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying for an order of appointment of employee of the Applicant viz., Mr.Manoj Kumar Prasad, Area Receivables Manager, as Receiver to seize and take possession of the vehicle which is more fully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondent’s men, agents, servants from respondent premises or wherever found with Police aid and break open of premises. For Applicant :Mr.D.Pradeep KumarFor Respondent :No appearance https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb. Appln. No. 200 of 2026__________Page2 of 2K.KUMARESH BABU, J.MayaO R D E RThis application has been filed for an order of appointment of employee of the Applicant viz., Mr.Manoj Kumar Prasad, Area Receivables Manager, as Receiver to seize and take possession of the vehicle which is more fully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondent’s men, agents, servants from respondent premises or wherever found with Police aid and break open of premises.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this application and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court record.

Operative part

3.

Recording the same, this application stands dismissed as withdrawn.17-06-2026MayaArb. Appln. No. 200 of 2026

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, this application stands dismissed as withdrawn

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments