A.Subramaniyam v. I.A.S., The District Collector, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District.2.Shiv Daas Meena, I.A.S., The Government
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cont.P.No.699 of 2024IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.09.2024CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.D.KRISHNAKUMAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMANCont.P.No.699 of 2024A.Subramaniyam.. Petitioner Vs1.T.Prabhu Shankar, I.A.S., The District Collector, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District.2.Shiv Daas Meena, I.A.S., The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Chief Secretary, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.1344 of 2018, dated 5.9.2023.For the Petitioner:Mr.S.UdayaFor the Respondents:Mr.K.Karthik JagannathGovernment Advocate__________Page 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.699 of 2024ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)Alleging non-compliance of the order dated 5.9.2023 passed in W.P.No.1344 of 2018, the present contempt petition is filed.2. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that, except in respect of four victims, the compensation amount was disbursed to the legal heirs of all other victims and that the order of this Court has been complied with. He would submit the legal heirs of the four victims are unable to produce documents and if the legal heirs of the aforesaid four victims come forward with relevant documents, upon verification, the authority concerned will disburse the compensation amount to them.3. Thus, it is clear that, except four victims, the compensation amount, as directed by this Court, has been disbursed by the respondents to the families of the victims. As and when the legal __________Page 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.699 of 2024heirs of the four victims approach the respondent authorities with relevant documents, the same shall be verified and then compensation amount shall be disbursed to them.4. We came to understand that a vehicle facility has not been provided to Justice Mr.V.Parthiban, Judge (Retd.), Madras High Court, appointed by this Court as One Man Commission to decide the compensation. If any such request for providing the vehicle is made by the One Man Commission, the same shall be attended to by the authority concerned and the vehicle shall be provided immediately. 5. The contempt petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.(D.K.K., ACJ.) (M.J.R, J.) 25.09.2024 Index : Yes/NoNC:Yes/NobbrNote:The Registry is directed to mark a copy of this order to:-__________Page 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.699 of 2024Hon'ble Mr.Justice V.Parthiban, Judge (Retd.),Madras High Court.__________Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.699 of 2024THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEANDM.JOTHIRAMAN, J.bbr Cont.P.No.699 of 2024 25.09.2024__________Page 5 of 5
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.