Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Indian Telegraphic Act, 1885 ss. 10, 16
- Electricity Act, 2003 ss. 68, 164
Judgment
Operative part
1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21.09.2017CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMYW.P.No.13850 of 2017 & W.P.Nos.15031 and 17338 of 2017 V.Ramasamy Gounder [ Petitioner ] Vs1 The District Collector Tiruppur District Tiruppur2 Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy No.334 8th Floor Block-B The Futura Tech Park Sholinganallur Chennai- 600 119[Respondents] Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus forbearing the 1st respondent from erecting drawing any High Tension Electricity Towers or Lines in the Petitioners Lands bearing S.F. Nos.13/2 21/2 & 22/1 of Vadugapalayam Village Dharapuram Taluk Tiruppur District until the strict compliance of the Sections 10 & 16 of the Indian Telegraphic Act 1885 r/w Sections 68 & 164 of the Indian Electricity Act 2003.For Petitioner : Mr. B.ParthibanFor Respondents : Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, AGP (R1)Mr.M.Aravind Subramaniam (R2) http://www.judis.nic.in 2M.DURAISWAMY,J., rgORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted a letter dated 20.09.2017 to the Registry seeking permission of this Court to post the above writ petition for withdrawal. The matter is listed today under the heading for withdrawal. When the matter is taken up today, a similar request is made before this Court and an endorsement has also been made to that effect. 2. In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 21.09.2017 rg To 1 The District Collector Tiruppur District Tiruppur W.P.No.13850 of 2017 & W.P.Nos.15031 and 17338 of 2017
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Indian Telegraphic Act, 1885 — ss. 10, 16; Electricity Act, 2003 — ss. 68, 164.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.