✦ Madras High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44.The Assistant Executive EngineerElectrical / OperationMoyar Power HouseNilgiris (DT)....Respondents 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23870 of 2013 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in KU.AA No.457-8/Ne Pi 1/E Ni.Uo/Ko.Vi.O/2012 dated 19.10.2012…

Judgment

W.P.No.23870 of 2013IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.02.2024CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.23870 of 2013P.ElangovanJunior Engineer Grade-INo.8, Annai Therasa StreetLIC Colony ExtensionPammal, Chennai-600 075....PetitionerVs1.The ChairmanTNEBNo.800 Anna SalaiChennai-600 002.

2.

The Superintending EngineerGeneration CircleKunda Nilgiris (D.T).

3.

The Executive EngineerMoyar Power HouseNilgiris (DT).

Operative part

4.

The Assistant Executive EngineerElectrical / OperationMoyar Power HouseNilgiris (DT)....Respondents 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23870 of 2013 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in KU.AA No.457-8/Ne Pi 1/E Ni.Uo/Ko.Vi.O/2012 dated 19.10.2012 on the file of 2nd respondent to quash the same and directing the respondents to approve the leave sanctioned under earned leave as Medical Leave as third spell to which the petitioner is legally entitled. For Petitioner : Mr.A.KumanarajaFor Respondents : Mr.K.RajkumarStanding Counsel for TNEBO R D E RIt is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the relief sought for in this Writ Petition has already become infructuous and nothing survives in this writ petition.2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.29.02.2024Index: Yes/NoSpeaking order/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation : Yes/Nomk2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23870 of 2013To1.The ChairmanTNEBNo.800 Anna SalaiChennai-600 002.2.The Superintending EngineerGeneration CircleKunda Nilgiris (D.T).3.The Executive EngineerMoyar Power HouseNilgiris (DT).4.The Assistant Executive EngineerElectrical / OperationMoyar Power HouseNilgiris (DT).3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.23870 of 2013D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY.J., mkW.P.No.23870 of 201329.02.20244/4

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Madras High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments