Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- K GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above, the Second Appeal is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, a memo dated 24.11.2025 has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellant stating that the respondents 2 to 4 have settled the entire amount due to the 1st respondent/plaintiff before the Mediator, Sub…
Judgment
S.A. No.203 of 2022IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.11.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADIS.A. No.203 of 2022 P. Poomathi …AppellantVs.
K.R. Palani2. Jayalakshmi3. Dinakaran4. Sankaran5. Karthikeyan …RespondentsPrayer: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 15.11.2021 made in A.S. No.6 of 2017 on the file of the Additional District Court (Fast Track Court), Vellore, Vellore District, confirming the judgment and decree dated 16.11.2015 made in E.A. No.86 of 2009 in E.P.No.17 of 2004 in O.S. No.77 of 2001 on the file of the Sub Court, Gudiyattam, Vellore District.1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A. No.203 of 2022 For Appellant : Mr. K.A. RavindranFor Respondents : Mr.M. Himavanth for R1 Mr. S. Vijayakumar for R2 to R5 JUDGMENT This Second Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 15.11.2021 made in A.S. No.6 of 2017 on the file of the Additional District Court (Fast Track Court), Vellore, Vellore District, confirming the judgment and decree dated 16.11.2015 made in E.A. No.86 of 2009 in E.P.No.17 of 2004 in O.S. No.77 of 2001 on the file of the Sub Court, Gudiyattam, Vellore District.
Operative part
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, a memo dated 24.11.2025 has been filed by the learned counsel for the appellant stating that the respondents 2 to 4 have settled the entire amount due to the 1st respondent/plaintiff before the Mediator, Sub Court, Gudiyattam, and the Executing Court, by its Order dated 12.11.2025, has terminated the Execution Petition and raised the order of attachment of the suit property, which is the subject matter in this Second Appeal. The said order of the Executing Court 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A. No.203 of 2022is scanned hereunder:3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A. No.203 of 20223. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent / plaintiff/ decree holder, has also filed a memo in this regard. 4. In view of the above, the Second Appeal is disposed of. No costs. The order dated 12.11.2025 passed in E.P.No.17/2004 in O.S. No.17 of 2001 on the file of the Sub Court, Gudiyattam, and the memo filed by the appellant and the 1st respondent shall form part of the decree in S.A.No.203 of 2022.4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A. No.203 of 20225.The Court fee shall be refunded to the appellant as per rules.24.11.2025bgaInternet: Yes/NoIndex: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderTo1. The Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Vellore, Vellore District, 2. The Subordinate Judge, Gudiyattam, Vellore District.
The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A. No.203 of 2022 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. bga S.A. No.203 of 2022 24.11.20256/6
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the Second Appeal is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 100.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.